Welcome to those new readers who are checking this out for the first time. Welcome back to the rest of you, my regular readers.

I would like to answer some questions suggested by readers, and I will try to tackle some areas where the C-R theory may be misunderstood.

I had a reader, Jens, from Sweden ask me, if matter inside our universe is contained inside, then, why is it not totally ionized, as I claim matter that gets consumed by the Black-Hole ^C-R [into the Neutral Zone ^C-R] is?

The answer is that I imagine that all of the matter inside our "observable" universe was here first, beforehand, and then, after concentrating, was sufficient to close-off this universe.  (So), Technically, the matter inside the active part of our universe has never been subjected-to being eaten and entering-through the Schwarzschild radius.

After sufficient matter accumulated, this created the inside Active Zone ^C-R.

NOTE: This was probably much earlier than 14 billion years ago, by the C-R theory reasoning. {I could not prove it, however.}

Separate AND Unequal: The Active Zone ^C-R and the Neutral Zone ^C-R

Once this established what I termed an Active Zone ^C-R, ONLY this closed-universe creates the conditions EXTREME-enough to establish (and maintain) the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  Because these two separate zones have DIFFERENT properties, with the Active Zone ^C-R being real-time active, and the Neutral Zone ^C-R held in a non-interactive manner, the internal (and active) matter does not mix with, and is not ever combined with matter that afterward passes through into the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  Something like oil and water, the two different zones are separate, and are kept apart.  They (normally) do not mix-together.

The properties of the two zones are so different, that nature "keeps them apart", isolated from each other.  Additionally, all matter eaten by a Black-Hole ^C-R, (possible only after it has become a Black-Hole ^C-R), is stored in an extremely "distorted or contorted" condition.  REMEMBER: Matter within the Neutral Zone ^C-R is stored-up so tightly, and so extreme, that no "speed-of-light-type" interactions can occur, {because the escape velocity there IS greater-than-the-speed-of-light}.  This means that absolutely no interactions can take place, and no exchanges of information or knowledge (of the electrical charge) can occur.

Also, all of the matter further inside of a Black-Hole ^C-R (kind-of the "core-matter", if you will) IS permitted to participate in all speed-of-light-type interactions.  This is one of the fundamental differences in a C-R theory brand-name Black-Hole ^C-R vs. all generic black holes (all of which are IMAGINARY, by the C-R theory, not real).

A quick summary: The Black-Hole ^C-R has an Active Zone ^C-R at it's center, and curvature at the exact center is always MINIMUM {because it is MAXIMUM at the outside edges, at the Schwarzschild radius}, whereas the black hole has only a (near infinitely-dense) singularity at it's center, and virtually nothing else anywhere inside it's volume.

Another way to visualize the two zones: The Active Zone ^C-R (inside) represents freedom, available choices, active participation, paradise, and stability.  The Neutral Zone ^C-R represents: Jail, secure confinement, deprivation, crowding, no choices (conditions imposed upon you), extreme loss of freedom, NO possibility of causing your own escape (from the inside only), no communication, no news, no timetable.

Only AFTER the Black-Hole ^C-R forms does the Neutral Zone ^C-R become established, and start operating.  NOTE: Under normal conditions, none of the operation of the Neutral Zone ^C-R will affect anything further inside the Black-Hole ^C-R in any manner.

A revision in my original thinking, based-upon real-world observations.

I have somewhat revised my thinking about the Neutral Zone ^C-R in the following manner.  After the Black-Hole ^C-R has been operating for quite a while, and accumulated a good amount of matter, as determined by the total proportion of stored-up, inactivated mass, to the total mass of the Black-Hole ^C-R, and the portion of that mass starting-off (and always present afterward) residing inside in the Active Zone ^C-R, the complete liberation of the contents from the Neutral Zone ^C-R may be so violent as to disrupt the (starting) Black-Hole ^C-R, and re-establish (or un-close-off) the object at the center (in the formerly closed-off Active Zone ^C-R).  This would then leave behind a visible object, such as a neutron star, or a magnetar.

This is a revision from my original thinking, that once the Black-Hole ^C-R was established it would continue-on forever.  I do not believe this occurs everytime, but there are now indications of some supernovae leaving behind magnetars or neutron stars in some occurrences.  I am more willing to admit now that I would "rather" allow this to occur than to forego the possibility that there ever was a Black-Hole ^C-R involved somewhere in the supernova process.

It is also possible that some supernovas do occur whthout ever forming a Black-Hole ^C-R, with all of the Neutral Zone ^C-R and Active Zone ^C-R creation occurring.  I can accept that some of the supernova 'starting masses' were never sufficiently dense-enough to create the Black-Hole ^C-R.

I would like to retain the flexibility to admit that my earlier views (uneducated guesses?) have been informed by conditions now known-about that I did not know-about back then.  My ideas are not totally "set-in-concrete" and unwilling to change, but that I do take into account all that I read, and I try to revise my ideas to adapt ALL of the known facts, or at least what I can glean from what I read from various sources.

I am also trying to allow that nature may not be quite as "exacting and absolute" as I had originally imagined, but may be more flexible and adaptable to a variety of extreme conditions, but with a practical-bent towards obtaining a useful goal {to recycle both matter and energy, and restore entropy}.  If I am wrong, I would like to know that sooner rather than later.  I still believe that the overall usefulness of the C-R theory is that nature has chosen something very-close to it (if not right-on-the-nose) to recycle matter and energy.  I invite all my readers to challenge the C-R theory ideas, though, and please inform me if you think there are known observations that may indicate some-other-type of operation going on.

Simple Rules of Operation:

I would like to go over some simple rules of operation, according to the C-R theory.

A Black-Hole ^C-R eats mass BY MASS, meaning that it devours the proton and neutron, but rarely-if-ever eats an electron.

All mass eaten by a Black-Hole ^C-R is stored-up in a "Neutral Zone ^C-R", a volume immediately-inside the Black-Hole ^C-R where the escape velocity (gravitational curvature) is above the speed of light.

The conditions in the Neutral Zone ^C-R are the most extreme in the universe.  Only in the Neutral Zone ^C-R are conditions so "bent, distorted, warped, twisted, or misshaped" that ALL interactions at light-speed are prevented.

NOTE: Gravity is "Caused-by" curvature acting-upon matter, and preventing it from interacting at light-speed.  This influence reduces the "energy-carrying-capacity" of matter in such a manner that some (most all) energy is squeezed-out from matter.  This energy which is liberated, is the source of the acceleration that matter experiences.

This energy is not also unlimited, but the release is restricted to ALL of the available energy possible.  NOTE: In the Neutral Zone ^C-R, where those conditions are extreme, matter is at it's MINIMUM-possible real-time energy configuration.

Once matter enters this MINIMUM-possible energy-state, no additional energy can ever be freed-up by gravity. [Otherwise, it would NOT be a minimum-energy state, would it?]

Honor and Off(er?) or (An) Off(er) You Can't Refuse

The matter in the Neutral Zone ^C-R still possesses some rest-mass energy, but none of this "residue" can be extracted if curvature "exceeds the escape-velocity of the speed-of-light". (Matter cannot be turned-off, interactionally, any more than 100% off.)

{It cannot go offer than OFF}

Matter residing in the Neutral Zone ^C-R IS NOT FREE to proceed further inward, to just wander back into an Active Zone ^C-R, [where the escape velocity is less than the speed of light] and all real-time interactions are permitted.  NOTE: This absolute condition is what prevents a C-R theory "brand-name" Black-Hole ^C-R from collapsing into a singularity.  Nature insists upon this safety mechanism.  The two zones are permanently separate, and can never intermingle or mix (while the Neutral Zone ^C-R remains intact).

Has Nature "April-Fooled" Earth's Scientists (since 1929)?

Let me also use this opportunity to expound a bit on why I think that nature has "April-Fooled" earth's scientists.  I will not claim it is deliberate, but it is definite.

After a few years ago, when scientists found distant type 1a supernovae dimmer and more red shifted than they would have expected, the scientists inferred that our universe is accelerating it's expansion in all directions.  What earth's scientists did not consider is: maybe distant space IS NOT the same as local space, nearer to earth.

The C-R theory claims that conditions inside our universe suggest a totally closed universe, which is very unlikely to be expanding at all.  Where the confusion runs rampant, our universe is more curved (bent, distorted, warped, slowed-down) as one nears the outer edges, or the portion of space that is more redshifted, in every direction from earth.

Is it not more unlikely that our entire universe is expanding at an accelerated rate [without ANY observable energy source], than that our "local" scientists are totally mistaken that 'somewhere else' in this universe possesses identical time-rate conditions as we do, here on earth?

The dead giveaway that the redshift in our universe is gravitationally caused, and not caused by expansion is the region called "The Great Attractor".

"The Great Attractor" is the main blue-shifted portion of this universe.  There is no indication that this region possesses sufficient mass to attract earth and vicinity at the rate attributed to it.  There is also no "backrush" or an indication that regions behind the Great Attractor are also being attracted-in to that location.

I would claim here that it is much less unreasonable that this region is simply running faster (in reality, is a less-slowed-down volume) than anywhere else.

NOTE: If the Great Attractor was simply a local phenomenon, there should be many Great Attractors, scattered uniformly across this universe.  Instead, we have one, and only one.

I would claim, from my old geometry days, that any generic sphere has one, and only one center.  If that center represents a 0, and every "outer-edge" of that sphere is at a radius of 1 (in whatever units we choose to measure that sphere in, and then convert it to a unity measurement, defining it as one unit).

If the time-flow-rate slows down as curvature increases, and it must do so in a "closed universe", it should follow that everywhere, not AT the center, the time-rate runs slower than at the center.  This IS exactly what we do see, in the case of the Great Attractor, even if science has not yet attributed the redshifts in this universe to be caused by that mechanism.

NOTE: This enormously simplifies the energy-accounting schemes, if our universe DOES NOT require a continuous source of excess dark-energy freely giving-itself-away. This also stabilizes our universe, structure-wise, for all time.  Since matter at the outer edges is MORE CURVED, therefore, less energetic, matter from there cannot simply "collapse inward", and gain real-time clocking energy.

That one simple point, completely-missed in the modern ideas about our universe, neatly accounts for both the observed increasing red-shift in all directions, and the local, regional blue-shift seen at the Great Attractor.  That is how gravity works, by changing (modulating) the carrying capacity of matter.  The effect is indirect, and DOES NOT expend any continuous energy to maintain this level.

To illustrate this point, imagine an orange squeezed by a vice or a clamp.  Notice that as the vice or clamp compresses the orange, forcing the juice out, the remaining portion of the orange features a diminished capacity to store and hold juice afterwards. Even once the clamp or vice is done changing the orange, the vice holds it's geometric shape, and does not relax it's clamping.  This "change to capacity" is therefore not in need of a continuous supply of energy, but the vice merely causes the orange to liberate some of it's stored-up juice, then ceases to cause additional changes.

What is also noticeable about this example is that once the orange releases 100% of it's stored-up juice, no more can ever be freed-up.  Only 100% of the initial juice-capacity (or less, if it started out not-quite-full) can be squeezed-out.  That is also the case with gravity (really curvature) squeezing (curving) matter.

Gravity is a (geo)metric-like effect, or shape (capacity) changing process.  Notice, that the clamp or the vice does not provide any of the juice (energy) itself.  All of the juice (energy) can only be freed-up from the orange.  The C-R theory maintains that, in the case of gravity, that analogy is also accurate.

Unique to the C-R theory, that I know-of, once ALL of the energy is freed from matter, no additional curvature increase (i.e., greater than the speed-of-light escape velocity) can free up additional energy.

A second unique thing to notice is that, while matter is in this compressed state, it cannot absorb ANY energy.  Curvature also accomplishes a task just like the clamp or the vice did for the orange.

All electromagnetic interactions, heat, light, electrical-charge knowledge, are forbidden once curvature places the escape-velocity above the speed-of-light.

NOTICE: Since the electrical particles are symmetrical, charge-wise, the negative charges (the electrons) do the "accounting" energy-wise, since they ARE freed-up outside the Black-Hole ^C-R.

Even though the positive charges are "held-in-abeyance, shut-off, turned-off, inactivated, prevented from interacting" while they are held in this highly distorted type-of geometry (or spacetime-metric condition), they do not disappear, or go away.

This unique "trick" that curvature plays on trapped matter (and energetic photons, too) is only "temporary", and cannot last forever. [There is no timer "clocking" on the duration, but the storage condition is unstable {by design}, and will ultimately release some of the contents, and possibly, all of the Neutral Zone's ^C-R contents.]

Our universe uses this "gift from gravity" to restore entropy, to fully recover everything ever eaten by the Black-Hole ^C-R, and free-up the contents from the Black-Hole ^C-R.  Because the C-R theory type Black-Hole ^C-R cannot ever emit any "speed-of-light-based radiation" while the Neutral Zone ^C-R exists, this forces the Black-Hole's ^C-R recovery process to be thermodynamically 100% efficient.

I consider the "temporary" loss of freedom by the matter and energy stuck inside the Black-Hole ^C-R to be a very small price to pay for the maintaining of our universe's overall state of dynamic energy levels, forever.

That I know-of, only the C-R theory has both a practical (new and unknown) method for the Black-Hole ^C-R to operate, and a perfect energy recovery process to explain the overall usefulness of Black-Holes ^C-R in this universe.

If one tries to count the estimated quantity of known Black-Holes ^C-R, and multiplies that times the vast contents of our entire universe, it should be obvious that our universe is extraordinarily fond of Black-Holes ^C-R.  This implies their usefulness, and their purpose in the scheme of things.

I have been publicly stating, for many years, that the signature event, or process, to determine if ALL feeding black holes are really C-R theory brand-name Black-Holes ^C-R is that every feeding Black-Hole ^C-R WILL spit-out, or reject (without consuming) virtually all of the electrons.  Nature has so designed the Black-Hole ^C-R that almost NO electrons can enter-in past the Schwarzschild radius. [It is possible that when eating heavier atoms, such as lead and uranium, the Black-Hole ^C-R does not completely strip-off ALL of the innermost electrons.]

ONLY the C-R theory maintains that, part of the nature of mass, and the enormous difference in mass between the protons and the electrons for identical but opposite electrical charges was [and still is] intentional.  Mainstream science has no clue, no inkling of the significance of that property, and how critical it is to the proper operation of this universe.

If this massive cloud of freed-up electrons is not found [or found NOT to be the case] outside every feeding Black-Hole ^C-R, then the C-R theory IS wrong!!!

A "DARK" Fairy-Tale [Which the C-R theory IS Happily ENDING]:

Only the C-R theory maintains that dark energy and dark matter are totally fictional, and are only figments of the imagination.  All of the properties attributed to dark matter, such as holding together the arms of spiral galaxies, are instead caused by the massive quantities of free-electrical charges [electrical imbalances] and the magnetic fields they generate.  Galaxy arms are held together, not by gravity from dark matter, but by magnetic fields {which polarize almost ALL of the electromagnetic radiation we see in every band, in every octave, at every wavelength}.

Consider the CHARGES

If scientists would simply LOOK at the known stray-electrical charge phenomenon apparent merely within our own, local solar system, and infer that level of activity galaxy-wide, the "missing" dark-matter problem would go away.  If one further added-in the contributions to the overall electrical activity which has been discovered by the numerous satellite-probes which have been sending back data for years, one would be hard-put to deny that something electrical in nature was going-on in "electrically-neutral" outer space.

While I do not believe that this universe has been actively and mischeviously attempting to deceive earth's scientists, I would say that they have already been April-Fooled for "365 and 1/4 days each year, with extra days thrown-in for leap years, too". Someday, they will KNOW that they were fooled quite effectively; but today, the C-R theory is making that claim.

Suggesting where the errors LIE, to the LAYpersons:

Whether the home reader waits until everyone acknowledges that they were royally deceived [which could be decades into the future], or reads the C-R theory today, and investigates it to their own satisfaction, I am trying to show where the potential errors in "group-thought" {where everyone agrees with everyone else, almost without dissent} lie.

I would like to thank those regular visitors who check-in often, and who are seriously looking for good (better) answers.  I can guarantee that the C-R theory's answers are different than the standard thoughts from "the establishment".  While I am a bit disappointed that the theory has not yet caught-on as I had hoped, I do see occasional glimmers of insight.  It is certain that science has been surprised by what they have found, and things in this universe are not as cut-and-dried simplistic as theories would wish.

I am not going to yell at you, and try to force my ideas down your throats.  Instead, I will try to gently point-out where the simple errors may lie, and suggest a potentially simpler mechanism.

I have heard it said that we may just need to wait until the current generation dies-off, and is replaced with a newer generation who have not yet learned: It cannot be done THAT way.  By giving this theory away for free, you cannot accuse me of trying to get rich by selling you these ideas at the highest price possible.  The C-R theory IS either right, or it is wrong (or partially BOTH).

I do try to assess how the home readers are either misreading (or simply NOT reading) what I have written.  I continually attempt to restate it, to re-package it, to show-off it's advantages, and show how it simplifies understanding.

A Simple, but Perplexing Question:

HOW Does Gravity Escape [Emanate] From a Black-Hole ^C-R, when Heat, Light, and Electromagnetic Waves do NOT?

or, If Gravitons can only Travel at the Speed-of-Light, Do They Ever Escape From a (generic) black hole?

If one truly questions: How does gravity emanate from a Black-Hole ^C-R?

If gravity uses "speed-of-light-based" gravitons, or speed-of-light-limited gravitational radiation, then why should gravity escape with ease, when light cannot escape at all?

If you are not TROUBLED by the "standard answer", and do not sense the probable paradox, or double standard for gravity and light [or any electromagnetic radiation], then the C-R theory IS NOT for you.

If on the other hand, you are perturbed that something seems amiss in our understanding of gravity, I have tried to construct the C-R theory to answer your question in a totally new (to almost everyone) answer, using exciting NEW insights, and a different approach to understandability.  I believe that nature has already answered the problem, and I am trying to share that new realization with everyone who will read it.

I want to show you where to look, what to look for, practical tests you can try at home, and clear differences from standard expectations.  The price is FREE, so you cannot do much better than that for now.

Even if you reject these ideas for now, I want to at least show you a totally new way to think-about, and to approach the Black-Hole ^C-R phenomenon.

One way, or another, these ideas will be (and already have been) laughed-at.  I do know that a few people have started-to grasp these ideas, and most just fail to see (or accept) the potential.  By offering it to everyone, I am trying to present these ideas to the widest possible audience (short of paying people to read-about it, and to learn the concepts well enough to answer some quizzes).

My goal is to prepare some newer, more active graphics later this year, and try to do more colorful diagrams to convey some of the new concepts.

I do ask home-readers to tell me what they do not understand, or where they have questions.  If I can answer them, I will do so.

Now that these ideas are slightly established on the web (but not widely referred-to or known-about), I will try to concentrate on showing where the C-R theory, in action, can be a useful tool to see what is going-on, and to anticipate new discoveries.

I hope to be able to do more quantitative results, and show existing web-sites where these ideas manifest themselves in the data that are presented.  Nature HAS been kind-enough to give us the answers, in plain sight, if you KNOW where to look, and what to look-for.

One of the most promising areas is looking at the large number of active, multiple-positive ionizations, present in very old supernova remnants.  I would be curious to know if there are any old supernova remnants where these multiple-positive ionizations CLEARLY do not show-up? I know of ones where they do, but I am not aware of any that do not.

The C-R theory contends that the release of matter from the Neutral Zone ^C-R, the "liberation" of confined protons and neutrons, IS what POWERS the supernova explosions in the first place.  This explains WHY these expanding explosions continue-on for thousands of years, without fading-out or "cooling-off", even after thousands of years of continuous expansion.

Thank you for taking some of your valuable time to consider these ideas.  I hope that I can present this information in such a way that more of you can adopt these new ideas, and incorporate them into your personal thinking.  By realizing HOW nature has accomplished this PARADOX of gravity, allowing it to emanate undiminished across the Schwarzschild radius, while barring ALL electromagnetic knowledge and activity, one can start to APPRECIATE the solution.

Until one realizes that this IS HOW gravity operates, you WILL fail to anticipate the real benefits achieved using this particular method: Curvature adjusts the carrying capacity of matter, which allows matter to gain or lose energy IN DIRECT PROPORTION to the strength of that curvature.  This is effective, UNIVERSE-wide. Matter is affected by this "shape-capacity-changing", and this action is what produces gravity (indirectly).

That is how gravity CAN escape from the Black-Hole ^C-R withour radiating ANYTHING at "above the speed-of-light".  Even though "gravity" acts like a force, technically, it is indirectly caused.  By confining this action to a (geo)metric-like gravitational curvature, and not "directly" causing gravity, say with gravitons, the "speed-of-light" bound limitation is avoided, and the singularity is prevented.

March 18, 2011 Blog

Introducing: A New "Killer App" for 2011 from the C-R theory; how a new line of thinking about how a merger between two supermassive Black-Holes ^C-R solves two puzzles that conventional theory cannot.

This blog was originally to have been posted in January, but other things took priority.

In early January, on a Friday, I was mulling over a new analogy to illustrate the C-R theory take on the possible merger between two supermassive Black-Holes ^C-R.  I used a variation on a specific analogy to better illustrate the major differences in behavior that would only be apparent in one's expectations when using the C-R theory insights.  In doing so, I believe I came upon a fantastic new insight, that gave me a significant new answer to a profound question that conventional science cannot answer.  Why do Black-Holes ^C-R only get so big, and why we do not find ever larger ones.  

I believe I can now uniquely and simply answer the second profound insight, and explain why certain supermassive Black-Holes ^C-R have been detected, either: not at the exact centers of their galaxy, or in a few cases, have been found to be exiting a galaxy at a great speed.

Conventional theory has no good reason to expect that one supermassive Black-Hole ^C-R should be kicked-out of a galaxy after an attempted merger.  Using a new line of reasoning, the C-R theory can now provide a simple answer at to the why's and the how's.

I now believe I can generate a new answer to that question, and give you home-readers a simple to understand analogy to solve the "puzzle" as to why this should be so.  You may still have trouble accepting the C-R theory idea as reality, but I believe I can explain it in an easy to understand example.

In doing so, I think I have now refined my expectations, and found yet another profound answer "hidden in plain sight" within the C-R theory.

SPECIAL NOTE: I have commented in previous blogs that ONLY by understanding a Black-Hole ^C-R from a C-R theory specific curvature standpoint, is it very easy to realize that the matter stored inside ALL Black-Holes ^C-R is already at it's minimum-possible gravitational energy potential.

WARNING: You absolutely CANNOT and WILL NOT be able to understand the following example without at least temporarily accepting the C-R theory hypothesis. {I will leave plenty of time afterwards for you to reject it again, if you so desire.} However, the following example will make no sense to you whatsoever if you refuse to accept the C-R theory logic. {You WILL therefore FORFEIT ALL of the new benefits that can only emerge from this new line of reasoning.  HINT: I only noticed this starting in 2011, so I know that it is available nowhere else.  This line of reasoning is so different than standard theory accepts, that it CANNOT be accepted or even imagined using their line of reasoning.}

A very important aside here: One must first realize that in a C-R theory type Black-Hole ^C-R there is a special condition that MUST be set-up first, in order to make the Black-Holes ^C-R useful.  This difference DOES NOT HAPPEN, and cannot be expected to occur, when using conventional reasoning.

That KEY difference is that ALL MATTER eaten by every Black-Hole ^C-R must go into a Neutral Zone ^C-R, where matter is held in a "(geo)metric-like knot-state" where it is entirely "stored at a curvature above the speed of light" -escape-velocity-wise.  

In the conventional thinking about black holes, this "special new condition" of storing newly-infallen matter in a "set-apart zone", where the escape velocity is greater than the speed-of-light would not be critical, as all new matter is expected to be eaten in an electrically neutral state, and virtually nothing would be expected to change for the eaten matter.  Only the C-R theory claims that this special storage method establishes the "forbidding any interaction at the speed-of-light, anywhere within".

Inside the conventional black hole, virtually the entire inside volume is expected to be a totally-hollow, void-like emptiness, until "the absolutely-tiny" center singularity is reached.  That singularity is a minuscule portion of the total volume inside.  In their expectations, it is the ONLY significant contributor to the operation of the black hole.

A second note: In the conventional theory's reasoning: the entire volume inside the black hole has the escape velocity "greater than the speed of light".  Conventional theory has not yet learned [discovered] that nature was/is designed to exploit this storage-condition for the maximum usefulness, and therefore, only concentrates "where this effect takes place" in a very limited zone.  Conventional theory would not accept that this "above the speed-of-light" escape velocity also effectively prevents any and all communication between any particles, or that it insulates the electrical charges.  By their reasoning, that condition (inside the black hole) has no noticeable effect on the action of the positive (or negative) charges.

HOME READERS: I am sorry that you must learn this new way to think about the problem, and the solution, before it makes any sense to you.  For this reason, PLEASE suspend your disbelief, learn the concept, test it out as it is stated, and see it's usefulness in action.  If you start-off with the idea that nature does not have the ability do this (which IS the conventional theory's beginning point, you will miss-out on the benefits that nature has already accomplished.  I am simply trying to "clue-you-in" and to help you learn this new way of thinking.

All that I am asking is to give this new idea a test-ride first, then go back to disbelieving it, after you have tried it out.  ALSO: There is nowhere else that you can go to learn about this new concept.  It is only available here, from the C-R theory.

A Practical HINT: The C-R theory highly recommends that you do not ever think of the concept of The Event Horizon.  This concept will severely misguide you, and will lead your thinking astray.

How to Re-Understand the proposed Black-Hole ^C-R Merger, using the C-R theory:

The situation faced by matter and energy is totally different for a "brand-name" Black-Hole ^C-R.  Immediately inside the Schwarzschild radius, the conditions require (and establish) a "mandatory zone" or volume where curvature (and therefore, the escape velocity) exceeds the speed-of-light.  Why this expectation is so critical is that almost ALL of the matter that is eaten is in an electrically "ionized" state, where it will be completely stripped of most or all electrons* {*In the case of really heavy atoms, such as uranium, I am not willing to commit that ALL the electrons would be totally stripped-off.  I would go out on a limb to state that up to iron +23 ions, and virtually everything of lesser mass, ALL electrons are rejected.}.  

Under conventional conditions [where light-speed interactions are not forbidden], any amount of this "electron-stripped" matter should be unstable enough to blow apart the contents almost from the beginning.  Please remember that the electrical force repulsion between charged (same sign) particles is some 10⁴⁰ times stronger than the gravitational attraction is.  I would expect the explosiveness of matter should increase proportionally, due to the concentrated electrical charges.  It is only the distorted nature of twisted spacetime that so convolutes matter in the Neutral Zone ^C-R that prevents this explosion potential from being realized.

Under these special conditions (which exist immediately-inside ALL Black-Holes ^C-R), all matter eaten is stored-up in an electrically neutralized state.  Similarly, photons of energy should be trapped in a "well-like, resonance-state", resonating in small circles (at exactly the speed-of-light, but not in the "standard-3" dimensions [directions: up-down, right-left, front-back] we can describe), but in "twisted resonance-"net-like"-wells", slightly next-to a region of spacetime where real time "used-to-be-measurable".

Technically, the photons would exist beside themselves, but not in the directions above, below, to the left, or to the right, in front-of, or in back-of where we could imagine them.  The charges would reside in a mini-dimension in a direction just different enough that the complete energy-value can be maintained, intact, but never accessed, changed, influenced, measured, or measurable, by anyone living in real-time. Effectively, this makes the stored particles electrically neutral, for all practical purposes. This "saves them for a rainy day", or stores them in a manner that is literally, beyond our ability [while we are outside the Black-Hole ^C-R] to detect them.

The practical benefit to this is: Since the particles and photons stored in this manner practically disappear, nature can bunch them, concentrate them, and handle them with total safety, as long as those "neutralizing-conditions" apply.

HINT: Alfred Nobel made his fortune by safely "stabilizing" nitroglycerine when he invented dynamite.  It was much safer to handle, and saved many miner's lives in the process.  The Neutral Zone ^C-R is to "safe-handling and storage" of this group of explosively-dangerous charges, similar to what dynamite is to nitroglycerine.

Let me add in this additional commentary.  The incoming matter, eaten by the Black-Hole ^C-R is already "subdued and conquered".  It is in no condition, and absolutely powerless to change it's fate, and there is no ability for matter or energy there to DO anything, [from the INSIDE], that can re-activate any of the trapped matter.

Before you rebel at this concept, let me state that this is not the only location that can influence the release of matter and energy trapped inside.  This is where external supermassive Black-Holes ^C-R come in very handy {necessary to the good workings of a Universe}.  What the matter on the inside is forbidden to do (make any attempt to actively escape) is NOT BARRED to a close encounter with an additional Black-Hole ^C-R.

This is where the true genius of this situation becomes apparent, and this is what I just realized at the beginning of this year.  Rather than setting-up this universe for FAILURE (as the Big Bang, ever-expanding universe is almost required to do, as time goes forward), the C-R theory realizes that this universe is: planned for success, and almost perfect* recovery of every photon, neutrino, atom, and sub-atomic particle that was eaten. {*Note: There may be some additional particles not totally freed-up at each encounter, so I do not claim a "perfect 100%" restoration happens every time.  The important thing is: nothing EVER goes to waste, nothing is ever lost, and nothing is beyond practical recovery [and I would highlight the PRACTICAL part of that].

Please do not take my word for it, that nature just does this, but check out the evidence that is observed, and see if the known facts fit the situation as I described it.

NOTE: Imagine if I wrapped you up in a big ball of the hawser-cord that supertankers or aircraft carriers are tied to a pier with, in such a manner that you could not move, but so that you would not either die or remain conscious as long as this "storage-mode" persists.  In a technical sense, all of the conservation laws would allow this to occur, but no interactions of any kind could go-on with you while this storage-state continued.  

Inside this Neutral Zone ^C-R

If we attempted-to measure time by counting the increments of distance that the light took, there, at the speed-of-light, to travel the smallest distance possible, time would not be measured, as no travel would be possible.  This is something-like what I imagine "life trapped in the Neutral Zone ^C-R" would be like.  Impossible to live, and impossible to die, yet unable to sense any passage of time, or participate in any interactions.  It would be very close to a suspended animation state, with the proviso that the storage conditions were so extreme, you might be killed if anyone attempted to extract you out of that state.

Secondly, immediately inside of that thin Neutral Zone ^C-R, every Black-Hole ^C-R has a completely enclosed Active Zone ^C-R.  This Active Zone ^C-R is in essence a completely closed structure, sealed-off from the outside, except that the "influence from curvature" does couple-through. {Its value does not change actively over time.}

NOTE: This conveying of the value of the curvature IS NOT governed-by any type of speed-of-light-limited radiation, but is more akin to a twisting, bending, warping, or distortion of the fabric of space.  I envision it as geometric-like influence.  (Imagine something that could twist your arm or pinch your skin without contacting it.  Think of the twisting-effect on the strands of a mop, or a piece of rope or twine.  This influence exists, but does not change with time, or vary.  It simply "is").

A suggested new pun to appropriately-cover this situation could be: KNOT in my back yard, or, KNOT that I can see.

NOTE: If we understand our universe, and the laws that govern it, that is exactly what conditions inside any Active Zone ^C-R are like.  Normal matter would be 100% at home, with true, real-world interactions.  It would also be something-like the inner tube that supports a bicycle-tire, or the inner-hole that defines a donut's or a bagel's boundary, but is not a physical part-of-it.  You could also think, it is something-like the zeros whose existence gives meaning to the numbers like 100, or 1000, or 10,000.  All of the above situations set-apart or define a structure that defines a larger object.

NOTE that in this setup, ALL of the eaten matter, and the energy a Black-Hole ^C-R acquires can only be stored-up in this neutralized condition, and that the matter can never simply "just-pass-through" this barrier to join the more-(energy)-active matter further-inside, in the Active Zone ^C-R, where conditions do permit full speed-of-light-type interactions, at least as long as the condition persists.

Originally, I never thought of this situation in this new way, where the Schwarzschild radius may act something-, more-like a magnet-set, where adding-in a new magnet almost snaps-it-into the overall structure, rather than acting like a doorway or a passageway, where one simply passes through without being changed.  If matter added-in to the Neutral Zone ^C-R behaves in this manner, that may help to account for the circumstances.  REMEMBER: The properties of matter CHANGE SIGNIFICANTLY in the Neutral Zone ^C-R, being "bound-up, trapped", whenever matter resides within. EFFECTIVELY: The electrical charges disappear, and are totally inactivated.

IMPORTANT NOTE: The Neutral Zone ^C-R is the only place in this universe where the conditions are so extreme as to cause this "neutralized" behavior.  SECOND ITEM: For all practical purposes, every Neutral Zone ^C-R is only a temporary-holding-state of affairs.  It IS NEVER permanent!!!!!

REMEMBER that the Neutral Zone's ^C-R "confines" represents "THE MOST EXTREME STORAGE CONDITIONS POSSIBLE".  It is much more like a brutal assault on matter's freedom; demanding TOTAL SURRENDER, than a peaceful stroll in the park.  The situation is more like: a mugging, and martial-law-confinement* {*without a specified maximum-permissible time limit}, and a suspended death-sentence, all rolled-into-one.

{I am probably guilty of under-describing the violence of the situation, because I originally imagined it as a more peaceful and benign process.  I apologize for my initial error in perception.}

Remember that this Neutral Zone ^C-R effect is literally: "The most extreme gravitational-curvature condition possible for matter", (especially since the singularity imagined by conventional theory never exists)

THE NEWEST OF NEW IDEAS (unique to the C-R theory):

Instead of a MERGER, it is probably more like a MURDER, when Black-Holes ^C-R Collide.

Since the entire contents of BOTH of the "to be merged" Black-Holes ^C-R are already stored, compacted, gravitationally, as low energy-wise as possible (in the most-exposed, most VULNERABLE outer regions, stuffed-into the Neutral Zone ^C-R), there is no "additional energy" available for the release-efforts to "reward" the larger Black-Hole ^C-R with "the easy to eat contents" from the smaller one.  In essence, the "hypothesized-massive" energy-release from the merger is more like a "super-wimpy"-addition-, of one "dinky" zero added to another "minute" zero; when the grand-sum total result is still zero.

What I had not previously considered, but what became obvious to me when I used this new thought process-model to explain to you at home, was an answer that I had not anticipated before.  When I realized what I'd stumbled upon, I was so happy that I realized I wanted to share it with my blog readers right away.

[Please set aside for the moment that some critics will state, "but the example you use DOES NOT actually apply to Black-Holes ^C-R ", and wait to see how this example still illustrates an important new point.]

The Merger-Murder Model (of Black-Hole ^C-R mergers)

Imagine two small, plastic, "kiddie-type" swimming pools, each one exactly filled to capacity, bulging to the last drop, with scalding hot water.  Now imagine that one or both of them get the idea to merge, or that they try to combine their contents, and make one even larger-sized swimming pool.  In their attempt to merge, the inconvenient fact here is that each pool is already at it's full capacity, and neither one can expand enough to take-in even one-more-drop of the other's contents. [Because of the uniqueness of the circumstances, as we have set-it-up.]

{Note: This is not an exact analogy for the Black-Hole ^C-R merger, but it is intended to illustrate some newly-thought-of possibilities for what one of the dilemmas may be.  Do not take the above example too literally.}

What this example highlights is; the matter immediately inside every Black-Hole ^C-R is stored in such a "tortured, convoluted" physical state that it is trapped, where the escape velocity is greater-than-the-speed-of-light.  What is especially important to realize is that, if, for ANY reason, this matter "exits" this new [highly distorted] state, it becomes incredibly, explosively unstable, since it is composed primarily of protons and neutrons which have been eaten by their respective Black-Holes ^C-R.  It may be quadrillions of times potentially more energetically explosive than the most unstable of chemical explosives, if it gets free.

NOTE: The electrical-repulsive force, from similar charges, is orders of magnitude stronger than the chemical-bond force.

WHY this NEW Insight could ONLY come-from the C-R theory:

What I had not realized before, until I re-considered this example of an attempted merger is: in order to release any of their contents, or share their contents (or to be overpowered by the larger Black-Hole ^C-R appropriating and "ripping-loose" the smaller Black-Hole's ^C-R lunch, the contents probably would have to be temporarily freed-up {from the Neutral Zone ^C-R}, to traverse outside the Black-Hole's ^C-R Neutral Zone ^C-R area.  This type-of INSTABILITY cannot be appreciated or reasoned-out by using conventional paradigms!!!

As soon as the "inactivated" contents escaped from their confines (from highly-curved spacetime), the results would prove catastrophic, and violently release the protons.  Whether this would occur in small batches, or in an apocalyptic, free-for-all, total jailbreak; in all likelihood, one or two of those Black-Holes ^C-R could explosively lose some of their mass, rather than: either-one gaining anything.

{HENCE: The sub-title above, that it may be more-like MURDER than MERGER for both Black-Holes ^C-R.}

Another special note here is that this release area, where the explosion would be concentrated is specifically located directly in-between the two Black-Holes ^C-R.  The resulting thrust-outward is also maximum directly between the two Black-Holes ^C-R.  That area (or volume) provides the ammunition to launch-out the lower-massed Hole, where the majority of the violent explosive power would be located and concentrated.

GUESS: The closer the merging Black-Holes ^C-R approach, the MORE UNSTABLE they BOTH become.  The probability of an explosive release INCREASES with their mutual proximity!!!

REALLY STARTLING NEW IDEA: The larger of the two supermassive Black-Holes ^C-R may have the MOST UNSTABLE (accumulated) MASS TO LOSE, and IT may become "The Biggest Loser", and not The Champion-Eater.

That is why, as an innovation, I needed to use the totally FILLED swimming pools to illustrate the proposed aftermath to the merger and to highlight the INSTABILITY of the situation.  That is why I did not go with a "truer" description of the "lone Black-Hole ^C-R", where the Neutral Zone ^C-R could expand almost indefinitely.  Only when I thought about the potential "jailbreak-like" escape-situation did I realize that I now had the "smoking-gun" type-explanation as to what event could cause a perfectly-normal supermassive Black-Hole ^C-R to be kicked-out of a galaxy at a high speed.  

HINT: Think of a juggler juggling bottles of nitroglycerine, with the certainty that any and every mishap will be his last.  This could also explain the second situation, where science has detected at least one supermassive Black-Hole ^C-R that IS NOT at the center of it's galaxy, but is significantly displaced from it.

NOTE: One would only EXPECT this type of unstabilizing behavior to be released during any most-extreme-merger attempt between the two most-extreme Black-Holes ^C-R, as they each drew near to each other's unstable, Schwarzschild radius.

This explosive release-situation would never be expected from a conventional black hole merger, where ALL of the contents from each black hole were squirreled-away "snug" inside a well-padded singularity, where the "practical" recovery options of their internal contents are not nearly as promising to theorists.

I was reading an article just recently about a rogue supermassive Black-Hole ^C-R that was seen exiting a galaxy at high speed.  [The article was from earlier last year, but I did not encounter it or read it until this year.]

While I cannot "prove" that this is what happened in this case, mainstream science is at a loss from their "Newtonian-type understanding", where the biggest [conventional] black hole should almost always win the gravity battle every time, and grow ever-bigger, without any naturally-occurring size-limit.

Where the C-R theory gives us something new to understand, to look-for, and to measure:

What is really neat in this new case is that I once again "stumbled-over" a simple, common sense answer, that seems to agree with reality, explains how nature overcomes a severe dilemma (to conventional theory), and provides a practical guide for things to look-for that conventional theory simply would not expect.

What is even more satisfying, is that I now believe that I CAN understand why scientists do not find Black-Holes ^C-R of ever increasing mass-size, but encounter limits which seem not to be exceeded.

This also explains why, when scientists are looking-for universe-wide distortions of spacetime that should-be radiating-out, away-from these proposed Black-Hole ^C-R mergers, they are finding no evidence to support it, regardless of their equipment's sensitivity. (See articles on the LIGO experiment that is under construction.)

Yet once again, I think I have found a significant "new" insight proceeding directly from a simple C-R theory type scenario, using conditions that ONLY THE C-R THEORY expects.  I had wondered if I had run-out-of new and simple possibilities that the C-R theory still had left in it, and the answer again seems to be NO, not yet.

I offer the possibility to ALL my incoming readers that the C-R theory approach is still new enough, and "uninvestigated enough" that there may be easy-to-discover items available to be anticipated to anyone (especially YOU who consider this theory) on a first-come basis, if they are only willing to try-out the C-R theory.  I am still hoping that one of my longer-time, returning site-visitors will make a significant, new uncovery (or discovery) that I have not yet thought-of.  If someone other than me can also use these principles to discover or realize simple truths, that would be my desire.

Of course, if there is nothing there, or the C-R theory is untrue, all would be for nought.  My hope is, I can be vindicated (and the C-R theory, too) if and when someone other than me can use these simple principles and apply them in some new area to connect to the existing, real world observations that science has already obtained.

Sadder news, too:

Although that new triumph seemed to greatly encourage me this last January, there was also sadder news on the home front.  My dear mother passed away suddenly and unexpectedly this last January, on a Saturday afternoon.  Needless to say, she "kind-of" made the C-R theory possible, by making me possible, and she will be greatly missed by her many friends and all of our remaining family members.

She had seemed to be in good health when I last saw her, just after Christmas, and I had thought she might have many more years left in her.  I do expect to see her again in the next life to come, sometime down the road (and I would hope, many years off), and I know that she went on to a better place, to meet her Maker.  I do believe she did her best to leave this world a better place for everyone by her having been here.

When I returned from the first (hometown) memorial service for my mom, my friend, and the webmaster for this web-site, told me that he received word that his mother had also passed away unexpectedly in her sleep.  I would like to acknowledge his loss here, and to thank him for his continued (and totally volunteer-based) services here.  If the strengths of his character are patterned somewhat on her role model, she did her job well, too.

Secondarily, I just got back this last month from a second memorial service for my mom, to return her to her hometown, to a final resting-spot she chose earlier in life.  She had already purchased a plot where she could rejoin her beloved family members from the earlier generations.

We had a very good service indoors, and with a limited number of close relatives present for the outdoor portion, only after a few days after the most nasty winter storm in a long time.  For that reason, the outdoor portion was kept very short. {It was about 20 degrees F outside, for that final part of the service.}

Anyway, I decided to include these brief tributes to our departed mothers in addition to just standard scientific reasoning.  I figured that this knowledge might be of interest to many of our regular readers, who return often for updates.

I had an interesting letter about some questions that occurred while trying-out the theory, from a regular C-R theory home-reader, which I will cover in the next blog, probably near the end-of March, along with my responses.  I would like to cover some areas that I have not presented for a while, and I would like to try to explain why using the C-R theory may help us to understand what is really going-on in our universe better than the competition.

By the time this blog is posted, we will be past the arrival of our 30,000^th recorded visitor to this web site.  I would like to thank all of you incoming home-readers who have ventured to this site, to consider the new, and non-standard ideas that have been presented here.  I do hope that you can incorporate some of these new ideas into your personal understanding, to get a better idea of the overall state of affairs in this universe.

This blog, last modified March 18, 2011

(To our regular readers, sorry for the delay in posting this blog.  I will try to blog more often, with shorter sessions over the upcoming year.)

Jerry Reynard