.

 

       First off, I would like to celebrate the C-R theory’s 20,000^th visitor.  I cheated just a little bit to get that honor, myself.  I checked-in when it was at 19,998, and I refreshed a couple times within the next five minutes thereafter.  There were many initial months that the site ran without a counter, so the real number of visitors is higher.

       I would like to thank those thousands who have visited, and I would especially like to thank those who have repeatedly re-visited.  I hope that I can aid more of you home readers in your quest for improved understanding. 

       I realize the difficulty some have with accepting these new ideas, and I am continually trying to re-present these unique ideas in new, fresh ways, with new “spin”, and with new references to items in the headlines.

       I also apologize that there is no pre-agreed-upon language to fully express some of these new concepts.  They are just too new to have a common reference understood and accepted by all readers.

       I would like to revise my blog strategy, and discuss why I believe that the C-R theory is relevant, and why it might be worth your while to read it carefully.  The C-R theory is my humble attempt to communicate a really NEW way of thinking about gravity, it’s true cause, and to share something important which I believe has been completely missed almost everywhere else.

       The C-R theory is something-like “informed speculation”, rather than a strict, by-the-book, attempt at theory.  I have been trying to share that our entire universe is quite probably the inside of a giant (universe) sized Black-Hole ^C-R.  As such, one of it’s most interesting properties is that our universe is completely closed-off inside.  This “forces-upon” all of the contents inside, a “preferred reference frame”. {with minimum gravitational curvature at the center [the blueshifted area], and maximum curvature everywhere at the outermost edges, just beyond our visual ability to detect, because-of a complete time stoppage.}

       The real significance of this can only be appreciated by considering a much smaller example of a time-rate change that is “known about”, but not widely covered.  I’ll start-off there.

       Home readers can access web-sites about the GPS satellites, where they can find out that the satellites orbiting some 20,200 km. above the earth gain about 45.5 usec every 24 hours from residing in a slightly lesser level of curved gravity.

(The satellites also slow-down by a bit over 18 usec per day, due to their higher orbital speeds, giving them each a net time-gain of around 38.5 usec. per day.)  Ground controllers then “correct” this time-gain-offset, and cause the satellites to “intentionally-miscount” (therefore, actually correct-for) this real time-gain, as if they were residing snugly on earth’s surface, in that same ground-level time-frame as the GPS user on the ground.

       By understanding that concept from one small item that we do know-about, I next would like to extend that same need to consider a time-rate-adjustment “Universe-wide”.  (Something-like, measuring the thickness of one sheet of paper, and trying to extend that small insight to understand some of the complexities of all of the forests in North America, or the whole world.)

       What I have never seen covered anywhere else is a realization that, if our universe is “closed”, then just such a “preferred-reference-frame” gravitational slowdown is required of ALL the contents inside this type-of a universe.  The amount of the effect varies in proportion to their distance from the center.  This also means that most-of the phenomena we see in this universe are all seen at a real-time rate.  They appear as they occurred, and events do not need to be corrected, time-wise. (the darker areas of the small graphic of half of our universe are really much slower, just as they appear)  (HINT: We on earth are not at the center of the graphic, but somewhere in the white area near the center [the white areas are all equal in time-rates].)

NOTE: Equal color areas in the diagram are also equal in their time-rates, whether slowed-down or speeded-up to us.

       The easy way to tell where the “center of this universe” is, it will be the only place everyone sees that has the maximum rate of blueshift to us.  This blueshifted location happens to be called “The Great Attractor”. 

       “The Great Attractor” is supposed to have such a large mass there that it is sucking earth, and everything closer-in to it, towards that location. {Hence, the “expected blueshift.”}  Science has also failed to find any indication of a sufficient amount-of mass located there to accomplish this prodigious feat.

       Everywhere else, further outside of earth’s vicinity [measured from the center], will be more slowed-down (or redshifted) to us.  This redshift is known-about, but is widely believed to be caused as a remnant of the Big Bang, and is thought to be Doppler-shifted, due-to the accelerating expansion.  Because of this ASSUMPTION, the redshifts have been erroneously “corrected” to attempt-to “restore their true nature”.

       Five or six indications that this “correction of observed-data” might be a mistake is for all of the un-caused anomalies needed to make this Big-Bang derived universe make sense.  That the C-R theory can eliminate ALL of them may be a stronger point in it’s favor.  Occams’ razor states that the simplest theory that fits is most-likely to be correct.

       Not to brag too much, but is it easier to explain why an entire universe is accelerating in it’s expansion, or to correct that perception, and show what is really happening?  The C-R theory is one of the few to attempt the latter method.

       The C-R theory claims that our universe is completely contained (inside), static (expansion-wise), very dynamic in interactions permitted, perfectly stable, and well-suited to recycling both matter and energy.  You can read-through some of my earlier blogs for more coverage on those ideas.

       A few months ago, I ran across an interesting article, about 18 pages long, from Wikipedia, about Jupiter’s Magnetosphere, and I thought I’d like to share the link with interested home readers.

Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetosphere_of_Jupiter  

(This article may be edited later on, and some sections or ideas removed or glossed-over, or revised, to make it less useful to the C-R theory.  Archive the article in it’s present state, if possible, before it changes-away.)

       (I had intended to remark upon this article a few months sooner, but had other things come up, first.)

       The article is mostly a simple summary about Jupiter’s Magnetosphere, and it had some very interesting items (from the C-R theory hypothesis) within.  One of the foremost was that, the net sum of energy emissions from all of Jupiter’s aurorae was 300 tera-watts (TW).  There is an interesting small box about halfway down the 18 page article, listing the various emission bands, summarizing Jupiter’s respective energy outputs for each of those bands.

       The C-R theory would like to remind scientists in their search for the non-existent Dark Matter, instead of looking for something that does not exist, why not try to look for what IS known-about.  Just look at ALL of the stray electromagnetic energy apparent within this humble solar system of ours, with the conditions around Jupiter as a prime example.  HINT: Most of this electrical-type phenomenon MUST have a cause, or a REASON to exist.

       There is a cyclical current flowing between Jupiter and it’s moon Io, sometimes as high as 5,000,000 amps, with up to 400,000 volts across the face of Io itself.  There are enormous magnetic fields, and electrical currents, too. {Comment: Almost every planet, with the possible exceptions of Mercury and Pluto (which now, officially, may not even BE a planet anymore), has some known aurora type storms.}  The linked-to article even mentioned that Jupiter’s moon Ganymede has been observed with auroral activity.

       I read elsewhere about a single storm raging on Saturn that has been continuously observed for months, which emits more than 3,000 times the level-of radio emissions of the worst, most intense earth-type storms.  All of these aurora-type phenomenon look like they are electrical in nature.

       IRONIC NOTE: If there is this much electrical activity “right under our noses” in our home solar system (earth’s “back yard”), then how much more collective “electrical activity” might there be galaxy-wide, with billions of stars, at least some of which are very “sun-like”?  Can these collective electromagnetic outputs account for most, or all of the “anomalies” in galaxy star-velocities which science readily admits is NOT “caused entirely by the influence of  standard gravity”?

       Could this simple electrical and magnetic activity be the cause of the much higher radial-velocities measured in outlying stars in galaxy arms?  Do these electromagnetic currents “drive the motor”, so to speak, that holds (and maybe rotates) galaxy arms together in spite-of their spin (or, their rotational velocity), and drives their higher velocity (than can be provided-for by gravity)?

       Might it not make more sense to search out and study these electrical type of events listed above, before questing off to search for Dark Matter, which is plainly lacking in any and all near-earth observations conducted so far?

       Without taking my word for it, I would encourage the home readers to do their own, independent searches (free of a selected pro-C-R theory bias) on electrical activities within galaxies, using Google, Bing, Yahoo, and/or any other of their favorite search engines.  Here is a potential partial list to search-for indications of electrical activity already known about, but not-yet “connected-in” {pun: plugged-in} or understood by mainstream science:

1. High energy free electrons emerging from galaxy centers

2. Cosmic rays (positive charges) released from galaxies or supernovae

3. Quasar emissions and galaxy-Black Hole ^C-R connections

4. Collimated jets of “something” emerging from Black-Holes ^C-R at nearly light speed

HINT: Gee, I wonder how easy it could be for a KNOWN force [electricity] to accelerate away two pure streams of excess electrons from a Black-Hole ^C-R at nearly the speed of light?

5. Where is polarized light (and other em-band frequencies, too) seen, and WHAT polarizes that light?

6.  What level of electrical activity is indicated by the amount(s) of polarized light seen in various locations?  HINT: It is enormous, whatever it is.

 

       I had a short list of some 69 different electrical phenomenon unlinked or unconnected by mainstream science in my October 2009 blog.  There are many items there the interested reader can look through and evaluate.  My contention is that they are all related, C-R theory-wise, to help us try to see what is really going-on in the universe.  They suggest a pattern of large-scale electromagnetic interactions completely unexpected by standard theory.

 

       After doing an independent search, the readers should note that there is a tremendous amount of relatively-nearby electrical-type activity for an “electrically neutral universe”.  Maybe that assumption of overall electrical neutrality is mostly wrong?  The C-R theory is one of the few theories to have a ready-made causative mechanism, {offering the creation-of ABUNDANT, stray electrical charges}, which is available to explain why free electrical charges are seen in such abundance almost everywhere we look.

       The next question is, if the C-R theory type mechanisms are occurring, is the level or quantity of freed-up charges then reasonable as compared to the real-world we see?  I would ask the home reader to answer that question after doing their own independent search on the above items.  I believe their answer will be an obvious YES.

       Let me state possible numbers here, just for our sun.  A widely-accepted number for the number of hydrogen atoms undergoing fusion each second is 4 x 10³⁸.  If the process of falling into the Black-Hole ^C-R is at least 20 times as energy efficient per encounter, then divide that number of atoms by 20 (the number for efficiency increase per atom could be as high as 80) = 2 x 10³⁷.  To make that number more manageable, divide by Avogadro’s number, 6.02 x 10²³ and arrive at approximately 33 billion amps.

       Divide those 33 billion amps by the 1 ten-billionth of our sun’s total energy earth’s surface area receives, and allow for some magnetic field sweep-ups or herding of nearby earth-volumes of electrons, say, up to 30 earth-diameters out (concentrating a volume of 900 times the size of earth’s surface collecting area) would yield a possible 2800 amps of continuous charge for planet earth alone.  NOTE (Although the volume was swept-out, only the surface area increase would increase the counted charges.  Measuring the depth-away would not increase the numbers by the cube, only the square.)

       Overall, I would recommend using this Wikipedia article on Jupiter’s Magnetosphere to search-for some practical results that can enhance your understanding of: Why the C-R theory ideas on electrical activity connections might have real-world applicability.

 

       I also ran into another fairly large book-to-be presentation (~160 pages) about an attempt to explain this universe using curvature, titled Curvature Cosmology, by David F. Crawford. http://davidcrawford.bigpondhosting.com/index_files/cc2.pdf   

       This author relates his unsuccessful attempts to publish an article in several magazines supporting his efforts at using and plotting curvature to explain observations.  It is a bit over 1 Mb, and was recently updated (in March, 2009).  For those looking for equations, and a fuller, more scholarly (mathematical) treatment of curvature, this looks like an interesting presentation.  While not quite as “radical” as the C-R theory, this individual seems to have had a very hard time getting those referees in the science-publishing industry to find some merit in his attempts.  (It is a dryer reading, however, and may be way too technically complex and long for the average, home reader.)

       I am certainly supportive of anyone else realizing that curvature may play a much bigger part in understanding our universe than is suspected elsewhere.  I do not believe this author realizes yet that our entire universe might be affected, system-wide.  I would like to offer readers other resources to help them understand curvature.  The book also talks-about the reluctance in the media to even consider this “curvature-idea” as noteworthy.

 

       There are also some new magazine articles that might be worth discussing in my next blog.

       I have some upcoming blogs ready to discuss some new thoughts on the W.I.R.D.A.R.D. Principle (When In Rome, Do As Romans Do).  This speculates on light’s ability to conform it’s speed to whatever media (glass, water, a vacuum) it travels-through, and how that may “mask” the changing of lightspeed elsewhere in the universe.

       Lastly, I would like to re-emphasize the unique understanding possessed by the C-R theory as to a practical method of how the C-R theory “brand-name” Black-Holes ^C-R help to reverse entropy in this universe.  Only the C-R theory understands how the Black-Hole ^C-R, with it’s Neutral Zone ^C-R located immediately inside the Schwarzschild radius can concentrate matter and energy in a time-neutralized manner, but with the potential to recover 100% of everything ever eaten by the Black-Hole ^C-R if one has the overall patience to wait, and let nature take it’s course.

       The process is so simple, yet so genius in it’s practicality and ingenuity, it suggests (but does not prove) a Designer.  The C-R theory maintains that it is no accident that our universe has plenty of energy to go around, and there is NO danger of our running-out anytime in the foreseeable future.

       NOTE: I do not claim to have invented this method above, but merely claim that I have been allowed or permitted to understand it or to notice it, and to share that new understanding with you home readers.

       It is the “system-wide package” of understanding that allows the C-R theory to make such a bold statement.  Our universe IS the inside of a “universe-sized” Black-Hole ^C-R.  It is not expanding, but static.  It will always be exactly-full, and will always have a critical inside density.  It cannot possibly collapse.

       Time does vary by location, and it also varies by distance from the center.  Time is DEFINITELY-NOT isotropic, or the same in all directions.

       The design of the universe is such that it cannot collapse “gravitationally”, because the matter at the outermost edges is worth less energy there than matter closer-in to the center.  It always is that way, and always will be that way.  The majority of the redshifts we see are (time-rate based) gravitational redshifts, with some rotational Doppler shifting going on near galaxy centers.

       The old “Newtonian-ideas” about gravity simply do not apply.  Those ideas were based on a simple summation of the forces, as understood by equations (written on paper).  They were very successful for many years, but have some real limitations. 

       The C-R theory says that it is “curvature” that causes the acceleration.  It does this by re-arranging (or redistributing) some-of the energy from the overall rest-mass when decreasing the real-time energy by exchanging the “energy-difference” into kinetic energy.  No external energy source is ever needed.*  ABSOLUTELY NO energy ever leaks-out from inside a Black-Hole ^C-R.  Also, no knowledge of the internal accumulation of electrical charge (even if those charges are “switched-off, time-wise”) can be communicated-out from a Black-Hole ^C-R, either.

*That means that the mass that creates the curvature DOES NOT need to create or provide-for the gravitational energy “in advance-of the encounter”, or need to account-for the exact amount of energy needed.  It is the mass itself that provides (exchanges) it’s own “internal” energy, hence a very complete internal-auditing is maintained.

       Curvature, a kind-of dimensional warping, or distortion, is present outside of a Black-Hole ^C-R, but there is no “speed-of-light based causative mechanism” to do so.  It is more-like a (geo)metric thing.  HINT: To imagine this “dimensional type-of communication” instead of using words, think if I communicated my intent to you by kicking you in the seat of your pants instead of talking to you.  That is something-like how curvature works to communicate and cause “gravity”.

       NOTE: The curvature directly causes the action of gravity instead-of being a product-of or aftermath-of the initial action of gravity. {The curvature is the cause, the gravity is the after-effect, or the result after the action.}

       There is a complete difference in action between the two different inverse-square forces {gravity and electromagnetism} outside of a Black-Hole ^C-R.  Standard theory has ASSUMED that those two forces started-out the same at the singularity (around 10⁹⁶ degrees), but then broke-symmettry (after temperatures fell to around 10³⁰ degrees), and act the same.  Quantum theory more or less expects both forces use the same overall mechanism to communicate, and the same paths to “escape”.

       The C-R theory INSISTS that no speed-of-light based knowledge ever escapes from a Black-Hole ^C-R.  This is not a BAD thing though, but part of the plan, and part of the usefulness of the Black-Hole ^C-R, as compared to a lousy conventional black hole.  By accumulating both matter and radiated energy in a time-frozen method, with absolutely no leakage-out, the Black-Hole ^C-R becomes 100% thermodynamically efficient at recycling energy.

       NOTE: This method insists on mostly catastrophic-failure type energy releases, resulting in a nova, supernova, quasar, Seyfert galaxy, and GRB.

       The Black-Hole ^C-R becomes a kind-of anchor at the center of a galaxy, but also a garbage disposal and an “emission source” of refreshed and renewed matter.

       SECOND NOTE: Only the C-R theory maintains that the second law of thermodynamics does not (or cannot) apply to the Neutral Zone ^C-R of the Black-Hole ^C-R, because of the “no real-time nature” inside the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  (The Neutral Zone ^C-R is the volume of the inside of the Black-Hole ^C-R where the escape velocity is above the speed-of-light.  This effectively “traps” energy in an inactive, incommunicative, neutralized state, or, “out of the plane” as we measure time, light, and energy.

       HINT: Think of a fish (in the air), trapped in a fishnet unable to “swim” in water, or of a greyhound chasing it’s own tail in circles, instead of running a race to win (around the dog track).  Also: Think of a piggy bank, which must be broken to recover any of it’s contents.  All of these examples present aspects of the Neutral Zone ^C-R.

       By understanding such simple concepts, the C-R theory tries to gain a truer picture of real-world events.  ALL of the major anomalies arising from the Big Bang scenario disappear, or are no longer needed.  The entire universe becomes humanly-understandable again, or is at least more-so than mainstream science allows.

       I would recommend trying to think in simple terms again, using known concepts, to understand our universe.  There are many areas I have oversimplified in this short blog presentation.  I would recommend trying to read some of the areas of either of the C-R theory presentations.  Only by thinking about this universe as a full system-package can one start to grasp the underlying simplicity and organization that the C-R theory is trying to showcase.  I am trying to help home readers re-understand this universe, and take on a new view as to what we notice and where we look.

       Please think of the C-R theory as something like a new field-guide, showing you how to recognize certain events and processes, pointing-out new items in contexts not yet considered by mainstream science.

       Thank you for letting the C-R theory try to become your “Theory of Choice” when choosing a theory to understand the universe-by.  I do apologize that I had to make so many differences between the C-R theory and standard theories.  I do realize that many will not accept these ideas at their first presentation.  If it takes you a few re-visits to warm-up to these ideas, that is expected.

       All I would ask is to give the C-R theory a fair chance to be evaluated.  If it has weaknesses, let us find them and fix them, or reject this theory and try something else.

       I welcome any home-readers to use what they can of this theory, and try to find new uses for it that I have not-yet thought-of or noticed.  If it is correct, I expect there to be many as-of-yet unnoticed new phenomenon that will fit into the overall patterns suggested by the C-R theory quite nicely.  If this is not the case, then the theory may need to be revised, modified, polished-up, or discarded.

       I have chosen to “give-away” these ideas for free, not because that is their “true-value”, but because freely giving away these ideas will remove some of the first barriers against their adoption.  If I did not believe these ideas had merit, I certainly would not have posted them on the internet.

       I am still learning how to apply these ideas, and finding new areas where they seem to go along with new discoveries.  I would like home readers to look for C-R type patterns of electromagnetic energy interactions.  Can we challenge the perception that this universe should be electrically neutral?  Do Black-Holes ^C-R really create electrical imbalances in every interaction?  If ordinary black holes do exist, this universe should be much more electrically neutral.

       I am counting-on the long term inevitable discovery of the amount of electrical interactions generated by every Black-Hole ^C-R.  If outrageous quantities of stray electrons are not found almost everywhere we look at where a Black-Hole ^C-R is feeding, the C-R theory MUST BE wrong.

       If ex-Black-Hole ^C-R energy-release events do not free-up tremendous quantities of freed positive charges, the C-R theory also must be wrong.

       PLEASE, when science finally “pulls it’s head out of the sand”, and notices this electrical activity, REMEMBER that you heard-about it here, first.  Only the C-R theory is sticking it’s proverbial “neck” on the chopping block, and demanding that such electrical activities SHOULD be going-on.  If they are not, the C-R theory is wrong.

       If there is any “easy” test of the C-R theory, demand excess electrons outside every eating Black-Hole ^C-R, and demand freed positive charges released from novae, supernovae, quasars, GRB’s and the like, powering their continuing, accelerating expansion.

       If you think you are starting to understand these new ideas, I would appreciate your passing them along to others, too.  I could use your help in trying to show others how fully useful these ideas seem to be.

       Thanks,

Jerry A. Reynard

     The first area where the C-R theory claims that vast majority of earth’s scientists have been completely  "April-fooled"  is both by the nature of the red-shift observed in this universe, and the expected outcomes based on those false conclusions that this universe is expanding, much less accelerating in it’s expansion.

     The C-R theory does agree that we do observe red-shifts which do seem to increase with increasing distance.  Where the C-R theory disagrees strongly with the majority is in the cause of those red-shifts.  While the difference COULD just be one of a philosophy, it is very important to note that the REAL answer is there, "hidden in plain sight" for anyone to see.  All one needs is the simple explanation to understand what IS ACTUALLY seen.

     The key to understanding the cause of the red-shifts is the BLUE-shifts seen in the direction of "The Great Attractor".  The C-R theory claims that if one understands "The Great Attractor", this WILL explain the true cause of the red-shifts.

     NOTE: If the universe WAS expanding, one should ONLY see red-shifts increasing in ALL directions with distance.  That is, in fact, ALMOST what we DO see, but not quite!!!  What we do see is, in one direction, there are blue-shifts which increase up to a location termed "The Great Attractor".  Conventional theory claims that this "Great Attractor" has such a mass located there, that it attracts ALL nearby matter, including the earth and matter in towards it’s vicinity. 

     The small problem with this is that by all measurements made, there is insufficient mass detected in this area to accomplish this amount of attraction.  Additionally, there is NO back attraction visible, where the matter BEHIND the "Great Attractor" is ALSO measured as accelerating (towards us and) towards that location.

     What is important now is to realize, if this universe is static, and closed-off, it MUST have a center.  With standard understanding, any circular sphere should have ONE and ONLY ONE center.  If our universe is completely filled with matter, up to closing-off this universe with exactly enough matter, at a sufficient density to make our universe completely reach the escape velocity of lightspeed at ALL of the outer edges; by reverse logic, the CURVATURE must lessen until one reaches the exact center.

      NOTE: If earth is NOT at this exact center, earth and vicinity will be gravitationally slowed-down with respect to that center!!!  This means that IF THIS IS THE CASE, and ONLY if this is the case, a blue-shifted area, in one direction of the universe IS NATURE’S ANSWER to the cause of the red-shifts, AND THIS IS what we DO SEE!!!!

     In simple terms, this means that the red-shifts we see, increasing with distance ARE caused by gravitational means!!!!!  This means that our universe is NOT expanding.  Our universe IS NOT accelerating in it’s expansion.

     If this universe IS NOT expanding and NOT ACCELERATING in it’s expansion, then it stands to reason THAT IT NEVER was smaller, and it NEVER started-off with a BIG BANG.  It is VERY IMPORTANT to note, in a universe like this, space is NOT ISOTROPIC, but expresses a preferred reference-frame, specified by the very (closed-off) NATURE of the universe.

     Simply stated, this means that time in this universe is NOT linear, and not identical everywhere!!!!  The time at the center of this type-of universe runs faster than here on earth.  Our location on earth is somewhat slower than "The Great Attractor", but faster than anywhere else further out from the center.

 

     NOTE: The 2.7K radiation measured in this type-of universe DOES NOT come from cooled-down and expanded Big Bang remnants.  It IS a measure of output processes going-on at the far reaches of this universe. (Novae, supernovae, quasars, Seyfert galaxies, and GRB’s)

     Second Note: This 2.7K radiation WILL NOT red-shift with time!!!  In a billion of years from today, the 2.7K will STILL measure 2.7K from earth.  There are many other areas where the implications from the C-R theory use simple understandings, and build on observed data to provide a better and simpler theory, much more humanly understandable than the highly convoluted, multi-universe agglomeration of improbable ideas forced upon the competition by the simple observed data.

 

     A second area where the C-R theory believes that mainstream science is totally wrong, and has made a great error is where scientists think that "space" in the rest of this universe is just like "space" in the vicinity around earth.  The technical term for that is: space is isotropic, or the same everywhere, in all directions.

     Einstein guessed that this was the case when he formulated his general theory of relativity, where there would be no "preferred reference frame".  What he never realized is, if our universe is closed-off, lets say, as in, the inside of a C-R theory-type Black-Hole ^C-R, nature has already made that choice for us, and mandated a reference-frame.

     Because space must be "different" if we live inside a "closed-universe", there MUST-BE a preferred reference frame.  The curvature will be minimum (or, zero), and time will be full, or 100% at the exact center, and will increase in all directions to the outermost edges, where the curvature will be full, (100%), or complete, and time will be at 0%, totally stopped.

     If we were located- at the exact center of this type of universe, we WOULD see ONLY increasing red shifts in all directions.  If that had been the case, we could not easily decide if we were inside an expanding universe, or simply a closed-off universe.

     That is not the case from here on earth, though, and we do not have to make that choice.  What we do see is increasing red shifts in all directions, AND ALSO an additional region with increasing blue shifts, in one direction only.  ONLY a closed-universe will "naturally" produce that type of a visible signature, unless a second mass anomaly exists to produce the blueshift.  The C-R theory needs no such anomaly, just the known ability of curvature to slow-down time.

     Where science then gets into real trouble, is that, by assuming that space everywhere IS identical to conditions here on earth, AND THEN CORRECTING the observed visual data to "correct for" the ASSUMED DOPPLER SHIFT, errors multiply.  After the observed data are CORRECTED, THEN scientists draw their conclusions on what ongoing events in this universe are like.  THIS was the second major area where Earth’s scientists have been completely  "April- fooled".

     What the C-R theory maintains is that, our universe MUST be understood USING THE OBSERVED data AS IS, at the same "real-time rate" we actually see.  When this IS realized, one can easily see that space inside our universe IS NOT ISOTROPIC, but actually slows-down as one proceeds further out.  The simple confirmation of this is that we also see one, and only one "inner" area, where objects are blueshifted, or speeded-up to us.

     Once scientists realize their error (or if they ever do), and must start to draw their conclusions from the un-modified data, they will notice that we live inside a closed-off universe, and time-rates elsewhere are not identical to time measured here on earth.  They will discover that our universe is NOT EXPANDING, and that the assumed acceleration of expansion is not occurring either.  Our universe should then make perfect sense, and it will be seen as fully compatible with conservation of energy.  It always HAS BEEN, but it would be nicer of "science" to notice and finally acknowledge that fact.

 

   Thus, in the two simple areas listed above, the C-R theory claims that most (but not all) of earth’s scientists, cosmologists, and astronomers have been fooled.  I would rather it was not that case, but since it is, I felt compelled to voice a dissenting opinion.  This "new reasoning" has not yet seriously been considered by the mainstream; but with reasonable science, paying simple attention to awkward details is too often overlooked or "avoided" in standard presentations.  This NEW solution to an old problem either has merit, or it does not.

   I would only ask that YOU, the home readers, check what I have said, see if the known data and observations really fit the C-R theory concepts better.  Ask Yourself if these concepts are both simpler and easier to understand for You.

       I decided to post one more blog, pre-April-Fool’s-Day, if possible.  One of the topics I’d like to cover would be a forum I noticed on Hypography discussing, How Does Gravity Escape a (conventional) black hole?   It was one of the few contemporary forums that recently has taken-up that topic.  I believe the C-R theory has answered that question to my satisfaction, and I did not see anyone at that forum bring-up the C-R theory point-of-view.  If I had added my comments, they would have started on the last page, so I figure, since this is MY blog, I can put the strong points much more prominently on the first page (of the new blog).

       Just over 30 years ago, I was also pondering the question, “How does gravity emanate from a black hole?”, and I went over most of the conventional ideas, including properties of gravitons that might allow gravity to be felt.  None of those options though neatly answered the point, without seeming to also violate Conservation of Energy.

Eventually, I was led to a totally new answer, one never discussed or visualized elsewhere, that seems to give a good accounting for: How can gravity (still) emanate from a {C-R theory “brand-name”} Black-Hole ^C-R?

       Part of the NEW insight is that, if gravity DOES NOT escape from a Black-Hole, but instead, curvature  “modulates” or makes changes-to (affects) the properties of spacetime containing that same matter, this “New Trick” ALLOWS gravity to maintain constancy, to exert it’s full effect, WITHOUT requiring ANY radiated emissions at all, much less needing anything travelling at above the speed-of-light.

       If we imagine a person standing in the center on a trampoline, or a bowling ball resting on the center of a round, clear rubber sheet, we would note that the SHAPE of those sheets was affected by the presence of the mass in their middle. (The analogy would still be appropriate if the sheets were not round, and or if the masses were not at the center, but that makes it easier for us to visualize in this case.)

       In this particular case above, allow us to move either sheet as high above or as close to the ground as we desire, but the affect of the shape still allows the person or the bowling ball to change their potential energy (height-above-ground) in response to the shape (somewhat analogous to the curvature of gravity).  If we stiffened the trampoline or the rubber sheet, a lesser amount of height change would be accomplished by adding more mass than if we loosened the respective sheets.  As long as we keep the sheet or the trampoline from breaking or distorting beyond repair, we could “modulate” the change in the height above ground (the gravitational potential energy) of the person or the bowling ball.  Similarly, if we modulated the mass of the person or the bowling ball, we would change the shape of the surface.

       It has also been noticed that when changing the gravity (the amount of curvature), the real-time rate of matter changes.  On earth, raising a mass by one meter results in approximately a gain of one part in 10^16th.  If one extends this analogy across the entire (closed) universe, we could imagine a full curvature at the outer edges, and minimum curvature at the center of the universe.  As long as we were not at the exact center, we would see everything closer in to the center as blueshifted, and everything further outside our position as redshifted.

       What the C-R theory uniquely has realized is that gravitational curvature is what provides or establishes this “reference frame”.  Remarkably, by changing the external reference-frame value, curvature is able to “adjust” the energy-value of matter.  When this energy value CHANGES, THAT freed-up ENERGY is what provides the source for what we see as kinetic energy (speed or the energy for the acceleration of matter).  Since this energy comes-out-of (or must go into) the very matter itself that is being changed, “gravity” itself NEVER provides, or needs to SUPPLY or to transfer that energy through or across the Schwarzschild radius from inside the Black-Hole ^C-R.

       That means that the “liberated” kinetic energy resulting from the action of curvature on matter (what we THINK-of as THE FORCE of gravity) is, in reality, something of an after-effect from, (and NOT the actual or direct CAUSE-of) gravity.  That means that “gravity” is not reduced in efficiency by the tiniest amount by having to “tunnel-out-of, leak-out (inefficiently), or pass-through” the Black-Hole ^C-R.  {In conventional electronics the tunnelling diode is reduced in coupling-through-efficiency by a substantial amount when the tunnelling diode “leaks” electrical charges across the forbidden barrier.}

NOTE: It still does fall-off with an inverse-square amount based-on the distance, but it is not reduced further in efficiency by tunnelling across the Schwarzschild radius (or, in more popular terms, across the event horizon).

       Another remarkable, and unique feature from this method of providing gravity (and yet another reason NATURE has chosen to use it), once matter has passed-into the Neutral Zone ^C-R, the volume directly inside-of the Black-Hole ^C-R, that matter has already surrendered ALL of it’s loseable-energy.  This completely eliminates, or turns-off, any further “pull-from” gravity, and prevents that same matter from collapsing further inward (back into the inner region where real-time activity is again permitted).  This “Inside Active Zone ^C-R is the exact-same “type-of volume” that the C-R theory claims IS the inside of our universe, and possesses ALL of the properties that we see in our universe. (See the green text below, the list of those properties.)

       1. Our universe always appears to have almost exactly enough matter inside to exactly close-off this universe, BECAUSE it actually DOES have EXACTLY that much matter.

       2. This matter is perfectly stable, and cannot possibly collapse further inward.

       3. Matter at the outer edges appears increasingly time-slowed-down (redshifted to us), because it IS that way.  Matter there is worth less energy than matter closer-in to the middle (or here, on earth).

       4. Matter closer-in to the center (from our earth) appears blueshifted, because it IS worth more energy, and it IS clocking faster.  It is worth MORE energy.  We would have to GAIN or acquire more energy before we could venture there.

5. Matter and energy are both perfectly contained inside this region.

6. The contents inside can and DO recycle perfectly over time (covered elsewhere).

7. Since NO energy can ever leak-out from this inside region, system-wide entropy is also contained-within, and this region can never “totally run-downhill” energy-wise.

 

       EXTREMELY STRONG HINT: It is not by accident, or an OOPS (accidental) moment that our universe uses this method of maintaining stability.  It is part of the PLAN, or the way this universe HAS ALWAYS been and will always be.

       NOTE: This (hypothetical-theoretical) type-of universe has exactly the same properties seen in our universe, almost point-by-point.

 

1. This type-of universe NEVER needed a starting anomaly like a singularity, or energy created from nothing.

2. This universe never HYPER-expanded after starting-out from a singularity, because there never was a singularity (or a beginning!!!).

NOTE: Sub-sections of this universe can and do recycle, and would qualify for a: “Let there be light.” type-of description, for those to whom that would make a difference.

3. This type-of universe is NOT now expanding, and does not need some “magical” energy source to provide the increasing levels of expansion.

4. Conservation of Energy is always strictly maintained, and we never get (or give-up) anything “for free”.

5. This type-of universe ALWAYS has exactly-enough matter-energy inside to exactly fill-up this universe, and to close-it-off completely, (from the curvature of all of the mass inside).

6. From the structural points discussed above, it cannot collapse further inward.  The contents are free to dynamically interact, circulate, recycle, interchange-energy or position, and collide, just as real matter is seen to do in our universe.

7. This universe will never “grow-old” or fade-away, or expand-apart, or run-down.

8. This universe faces absolutely NO time-constraints about how the “supposed-to-be-young-looking” structures evolved, why galaxies look like they do, why star clusters behave as they do, or why matter has such a complex structure overall.

 

Remarkably, this type of a universe HAS BEEN mistaken for a universe created ONLY 13.7 Billion years ago, and the “gravitational redshift” has been mistaken as a “Doppler shift”, caused by the expansion of the universe.

The increasing blueshift (up to a point) is the dead giveaway that the redshift is not caused by expansion, or rushing-away, but is caused by changing gravitational curvature, adjusting the “time” difference in each timeframe observed.

 

SEPARATE ACCOUNT

Although the expansion of this universe COULD explain the increasing red shift with a distance, it cannot explain-away the simultaneously-seen increasing blueshift (up to a certain point).  The action of another “mysterious anomaly” needs to be invoked to explain this away.  The simple overlaying “time-frame reference-change” can explain both the redshift and the blueshift quite easily.

Look for another blog on April-Fooling Science, TWICE, to follow immediately.