Although it does not have anything to do with the overall C-R theory, I would like to include a few technical details for the interested viewer-reader, about the shooting of the segments for the C-R theory.

The first actual segment which we shot was the simple experiment, Disproving the World’s Greatest Experts on Gravity.  We shot that outside of the Gallery Place main entrance, on a cold stone bench on a cold winter’s day in February.  Although I was happy with the video quality, the sound lacked the clarity I had hoped-for.  Some segments not used on the included clip used the built-in mike on the Sony camcorder, and it was not suitable for downtown use.  The low frequency bus rumble and wind noise and overall traffic noise was objectionable even though the traffic was 10-20 times further from the camera than I was.  The included segment used a Calrad shotgun mike about 3 feet away from me (out of camera range).  The sound was better, but the traffic and wind noise was still much greater than I cared for.

Segments filmed in a park a few weeks later used the same shotgun mike even closer, and placed on the ground (on a short gooseneck mike stand), aimed up at me (at least 35 degrees away from city traffic a half-block behind me).  The occasional fire-engine’s, sirens, and bus and truck rumble, and traffic horns were noticeable, but not dominating.  I did enable a frequency-rolloff filter afterwards in the editing studio, where I cut everything below 300 Hz and removed highs above 5 Khz.  (I use this for almost all voice segments shot outside, in the real world.)  The noise is recorded, but filtered after-the-fact.

When we started shooting segments at the National Building Museum at the Big Blue Nut (part of a sculpture outside the building), I used the shotgun mike handheld, within 6", and the background noise was much less annoying.  We tried a cheap wireless mike as an alternative for sound pick-up, but the radio frequency interference downtown DC made it near-useless, with dropouts and clicks randomly occurring.  The setup may be OK for the suburbs, but we don’t bring it along anymore on downtown video shoots.

Almost all of the camera shots are mounted to a tripod.  I have a lightweight tripod, with lousy pan or sweep capabilities, which I use on fixed, non-moving shots.  Once set, it stays motionless.  I have a much nicer tripod with very smooth fluid-like motion, with good pan characteristics, but it is much-bigger, and about twice as heavy.  (Bringing it inside buildings is more of a hassle, too, with increased security worries.)  It also stands as high as 6’ when cranked-up all the way, so it is good for shots needing height advantages.

I don’t like face close-ups, especially of me, and since I edit all the videos, none get used by me.  Broadcasters like to over-zoom-in on faces when their hired "talent" is talking, but I don’t work for them.  I like very relaxed, room-sized conversation-style talks, as if I were in your living room, or in some public place, telling you about the C-R theory.  No-one has written-in to complain, yet {but even if they did, I might not change}, so I intend to keep it that way for the near future.

I am still learning to edit videos with the software, Sony Vegas Pro 8 version.  I haven’t nearly mastered all the tricks, yet, but there is enormous capability within the software.  I have been tempted to try-to color-correct or contrast-enhance some of the videos, but I haven’t done so.  I haven’t even tried any of the multitude of transition effects from scene-to-scene.  Many of the segments have been single-takes, with no internal editing.

I still have several hours of shots needing editing, and have enough material for 20-30 more short segments.  Since many of the C-R theory ideas are very different from standard science-thinking, I hope these video clips help to get-across the C-R theory point-of-view better than just "words on a page".  I know many of these ideas have never even been considered as reasonable, and I know mainstream science rejects (or rejected in the past and intend to remain consistent) the key C-R theory ideas, because no-one has ever considered or championed them.  I intend to change that with these videos.

I expect those that already have an opinion will not change overnight, if ever.  What I hope-for is that a new generation, who have not yet been taught that things don’t work this way, might find the advantages in understanding gained by considering the C-R theory points outweigh the old methods, which clearly DON’T understand, much less anticipate, much of what is seen in this universe.

I am reminded of an old quote (I believe asked of Neils Bohr): Professor, we all know your theory is crazy, the real question is; is it crazy enough?  I am additionally reminded of a suitable hypothetical humorous reply: Dear Mr. Reynard, I strongly doubt your C-R theory is half crazy, I believe both halves are crazy.  Such methods may be needed to arrive at a simple way to understand what goes-on in this universe.  It is one thing to come-up with convoluted theories based-upon "squiggly-line funny Greek symbols" filling-up blackboards or book pages needing triple PhD-major degrees to understand, but the C-R theory did not try that way.

Upcoming segments expected soon should be: 10,000 lesser Black-Holes ^C-R at our galaxy’s central 3 Light-years; Overcoming Entropy; "brand-name" Black-Holes ^C-R, and their 2 "key" internal parts; Why Supernova Remnants continue Expanding; What LHC scientists have already missed, (and right under their noses, too); A Prediction from UnderstandingCurvature: No Frame-Dragging

I have a list with at least 40-50 more potential short topics I would like to cover, giving a unique C-R theory insight into our universe.  Almost all of these ideas covering: "How gravity [as curvature] works (& friends)", are new areas (to science), totally unexpected by the way current scientists have been trained.  Even if these ideas are wrong, they have NEVER been objectively considered, just pre-rejected or excluded.  I would like to demonstrate how I understand that curvature really works, and how it imposes certain constraints upon matter, in very simple ways, that reveals a "hidden-side" of our universe as a complete, working-recycling system, "closed-off" yet not "run-down" or dissipated.  How what we see in this universe IS EVIDENCE of a system, operating smoothly and precisely, behaving as one might expect such a system to do.

    My hope is that, if I show you, the blog readers, where to look, what to look-for, how to check nature out, what it is doing, why "what is actually seen" makes sense, how it fits into a plan, and reasons that it gives YOU a more reasonable explanation than the existing competition {The Big Bang}, should give at least some readers valuable new insights they have never considered before.  I want to share these new thoughts, new processes, new understandings with anyone who will listen (or read them).  If you then reject them, at least you have had the opportunity to learn something new, and to find-out a new way to learn from nature by simple observation.  If you have been too well indoctrinated by the current system, those who replace you may come to my understanding.

If these C-R theory ideas I have presented are not correct, then any errors should surface and be pointed-out.  The events I describe, and the methods I suggest to use should fail spectacularly (now or in the future).  You will then know another way that nature does not work.  If I can get other individuals looking into 40-50 areas of current poor understanding, maybe one of them can see something more than I have seen, if I am wrong.  At least, the jokes should still be funny, even if the insight expires.

As always, your comments, questions, and suggestions are welcome.  If any readers know of phenomenon I have not mentioned, or linked-in to the C-R theory, that sound like they could fit-in to the C-R theory understanding, or bolster the C-R theory’s acceptance, that would probably be even more welcome.

If you can think a new thought, or discover a new process inspired by the C-R theory’s ideas (but not directly attributable to it), that would be fine, too.

Last revised July, 7, 2009

In the popular media, it is always said that our universe is open, expanding (with expanding expansion), has no center and no edge.  The C-R theory would dispute that strongly, and in this blog I would like to argue the case, and present the C-R theory side.

Let me start with the basics.  If you understand gravitational curvature, it must superimpose a preferred reference frame over a closed universe.  There will be minimum curvature (bending, warping, shape-influencing pulling) at the center (actually zero from the surrounding mass, plus a base amount, if any, added from any possible larger external surroundings (unknown to us, but quite possible).

For any spherical item, a light bulb, a basketball, a planet, a ping-pong ball, a bowling ball, we are not surprised that it would have a center, and an outer edge roughly the same distance from the center in all directions.  Such is also the case for our universe.

If one can imagine any structure as large as our universe, it does not take all that high of a density to completely close off that structure.  It does take a lot of matter, however, with the size being so enormous that all human-based comparisons seem inadequate.  Nonetheless, the C-R theory states that our universe appears almost exactly filled with enough matter to almost close-off our universe most simply because that IS now the case, and always has been so.

The red-shifts observed everywhere in this universe are almost entirely because of a gravitational effect.  It is known that more intense gravity (such as that on the surface of this earth) runs slower than less “bent” gravity, such as that experienced by a GPS satellite some 22,100-22,200 km above earth’s surface.  Although the satellite’s time slows down some 7 microseconds per day from the higher orbital velocity, the satellite gains almost 45 microseconds per day from the lesser gravitational strength at that height, for a net gain of about 38 ½  microseconds per day.  Technically, we do not notice that because the clock circuits aboard the satellites are programmed to “miscount” the true time, to correct for this extra time gain.

In the big scheme of things within this universe, this amount is miniscule, but does serve as a guide to much stronger actions.  At the farthest objects we can see, the red-shift is very strong, and the slowdown is substantial.  Notice also that the objects we do see farther away ARE NOT running at the same clock-rate as we experience here on earth, but they are substantially slowed-down.  That means that they are not emitting light at the same rate as they would here on earth, and this is why we also see them dimmer.

The second item about that condition is that, since the objects there ARE NOT like objects here on earth, but are really slowed down as they appear, when scientists here on earth see their light and then CORRECT their red-shifts as if they really WERE the same as here on earth, they mis-correct those objects, and conclude that they must be dimmer than scientists imagined (which they ACTUALLY ARE), then mis-conclude that the perceived expansion of this universe is accelerating, or expanding even more!!

This means that in all probability, the size of our universe has been severely overestimated (by a factor of 10 or more), and the amount of “missing” mass needed to fill-up this universe has been also greatly overestimated.

Another area of common error is that conventional, Newtonian-type understanding of a closed universe is that it must start collapsing almost immediately, unless there is a “mysterious” dark energy present to counter the incessant pull of gravity.  From a good understanding of curvature, this is clearly not the case.  Notice that the most curved matter in this universe is at the outer edges, with curvature decreasing until, at the center, curvature is minimum.  This greatly stabilizes the closed universe, and keeps it from collapsing.  This also means that matter at the outermost edges of this universe is the most “downhill”, energy-wise, from a gravitational curvature point-of-view.  When conventional scientists were figuring-out the equations they tried to use to understand the overall structure of this universe, they totally disregarded the reference-frame that a complete gravitational curvature would impose over the contents.

Since the C-R theory is based upon a concept-based understanding, and not derived from studying equations (book-based simple solutions from lab-models), a new understanding was reached sensing the inherent stability of any closed universe.

If one tried imagining known items, like a bowling ball, or a large bolder, or a ping pong ball, and imagined that they were in imminent danger of collapse (which they are not), one could get the sense that our universe is just as stable, and just as unlikely to collapse.  Those that imagine the imminent collapse are somewhat like the scientists back around 1900 who imagined the hydrogen atom’s electron collapsing into the proton, based upon Maxwell’s equations. (see The Ultraviolet Catastrophe.

The simple way to tell that such a time-rate change is going on in this universe, is nature’s answer, hidden in plain sight.  That is the blue-shifted region we know as the Great Attractor.  This volume of the universe displays objects that are blueshifted to us, instead of red-shifted.  While a giant, weird gravitational anomaly might explain such behavior, a much simpler explanation is provided by the C-R theory.  The C-R theory explanation is that: We live in a closed universe, with the preferred reference frame superimposed over us, and we are not at the center.  The maximum blueshifted region corresponds with the center of the entire universe.  That volume of space is running the fastest, and is un-slowed-down in any way.  We here on earth are more slowed down, hence those faster-clocking areas appear blueshifted to us.  NOTE: If such a thing is seen, we would expect that behind the Great Attractor we would detect no additional in-falling of matter from behind, towards the attractor.  Although there is some amount of large mass there, as is common in almost all known galaxies, there is nowhere near enough mass to cause the proposed “attractor” that conventional theory expects.

Also note, if the Great Attractor really was some giant anomaly, then relativity demands that everything everywhere in this universe should be identical, and many Great Attractors should be seen.  Alas (for those expectations) there is one, and only one.

If the Great Attractor is caused by gravitational slowdown, then our universe should have one, and only one center, thus, only one place of maximum blueshift.  Additionally, in all directions, including far behind the Great Attractor, the far-reaches of this universe appear with the same red-shifts in all directions.

Note: In a closed universe, we do not violate conservation of energy continually.  We do not need to accelerate ALL the contents of the universe, and we do not need to accelerate the acceleration rate too.  Our universe’s contents are forever contained, and forever intact, and secure.  The overall inside density is exactly sufficient, and will never fall short, and will never gain additional mass or energy.  Technically, because the universe is contained, the contents of this universe will never fade-out or dilute over time.  The 2.7 K radiation we measure from earth will never change it’s value over time.  The temperature value will change with changing location (provided a sufficient distance has been covered).

PREDICTION: In the time it takes the Milky-Way galaxy and Andromeda to pivot around their common, center-of-mass-axis 180° , the redshift-blueshift of the respective viewpoints will reverse.  Prediction:  If we could ask someone in Andromeda right now, how they see us on planet earth (and environment), they would announce they see us as redshifted.

If they did see us as blueshifted, then the C-R theory would confirm that our two galaxies were on a collision heading.

NOTE the simplifications gained by the C-R theory viewpoint.  Our universe regains its simplicity, and things happen for a good reason.  There are no more strange expectations of wild happenings on an ongoing basis, with energy appearing from seemingly nowhere.
      

There is another consideration that the C-R theory also has an opinion on.  That is why do galaxies seem to have much greater gravitational presence extending out to the visible edges of the galaxy.  The simple answer is that the coupling of orbital motion observed in matter more distant from the center of a galaxy is held in place not by gravity, but by electromagnetic actions (and interactions) between the stars in the radial arms.  It is not the gravitational mass of the galaxies that holds the spinning galaxy arms in place, but electromagnetic interaction on a massive scale.  The large polarized current flows almost hold-hands with the other stars, but are not dependent nearly as much on gravity as standard theory has supposed.

I will not cover the source of the currents in this blog, but earlier blogs will describe a simple mechanism whereby stars may produce much greater current flows (hence magnetic fields) than standard theory ever supposed.  The interaction between those currents, with collimated flows, locking currents, and magnetic binding may help to explain why galaxies hold together, rather than fly apart.  The C-R theory proposes that we never need any type of dark matter to gravitationally bind galaxies together.

The C-R theory proposes that the amount of magnetic-electrical currents flowing in galaxies may be billions of times stronger than conventional theories suppose.  Check the earlier blog on the double negative ionization of ALL the hydrogen atoms in our sun’s photosphere to get some idea of the level of currents that may be emanating just from our sun.  Combine, unite, and synchronize these currents into mutually joined fields, and local gravity may not be needed to explain the motions observed in the outermost stellar-spiral arms of a galaxy, the furthest from the galaxy’s core.

There should be a new version of a very simple experiment anyone can do at home to test out a new concept of gravity, which has been hidden in plain sight for many years, on line after I return from vacation.  The experiment is demonstrated in the on-line video: Disproving the world’s greatest experts on gravity, but the sound is not as good as the visual portion.  I have a new version already shot, and awaiting editing, but not currently ready for display.

For the inquiring reader, who has always wondered, what would it be like inside a Black-Hole ^C-R, I have very good news for you.  You already know, and have seen it anytime you went out and looked at the night sky.  We (humanity) live inside a giant Black-Hole ^C-R, or more correctly, in the Active Zone ^C-R portion of a Black-Hole C-R, which is a C-R theory exclusive idea, unique to the C-R theory.  Of course, our universe is much bigger than the normal, lesser Black-Holes ^C-R we almost “see” in this universe, and these smaller Black-Holes ^C-R most certainly don’t have the inside elbow room that our entire universe contains.  The principles are the same.  The smaller individual Black-Holes ^C-R may have solid, liquid, or plasma filled active centers, and are thus unlikely to contain any advanced civilizations.

Just as our universe contains many billions of lesser Black-Holes ^C-R, it is conceivable that the Black-Hole ^C-R containing our universe may be a part of a yet larger mega-universe, further outside our visible range.  Since we are insulated, isolated and closed-off from this outside range, with a likely Neutral Zone ^C-R buffering the barrier, and consuming any external matter or energy the yet larger Black-Hole ^C-R might ever consume, we are unlikely to ever know the answer (and if we did know the answer, it would almost have to be as a result of a universe-sterilizing catastrophic failure, or an “inward release” of our universe’s Neutral Zone ^C-R.  If one thinks of the equipment damaging energy release from the confined protons experienced at the LHC during it’s opening weeks of testing, and multiplies that by a full universe’s worth of hot, even more sizzlingly-energetic protons, one gets the idea what might await our most “meddlesome” progeny in the billions of years to come.

The likelihood of the above scenario ever happening is highly unlikely, due to many built-in safety mechanisms inherent in our universe’s design.  (We couldn’t even start such meddling until we reached the outer edges of our universe, which is a very long time off.)  If is far and away more outrageous than even such trivial (single stellar system) energy-harnessings like a proposed Dyson sphere.  This is where an advanced society harnesses or harvests (confines and captures) the entire stellar energy output of a sun, like ours, for their use and pleasure.

Such an arrangement could theoretically provide 10 billion humans each with the equivalent energy of our entire planet’s worth of solar energy for personal use.  Even with a horribly inefficient recovery system, we could hardly imagine having that amount of energy at our beck and call.  There might even be enough that some people would be willing to share their abundance with anyone in need.  It might also drive up the value of such “useless” commodities as abundant cold or a shady spot.

Back to reality.  I have heard much speculation on our universe, it’s size, it’s age, it’s ultimate fate, it’s seemingly illogical nature, and it’s ultimate un-knowability.  I believe that the C-R theory has better answers, much more human friendly to clear understanding, and with a much better fit to the real world, as actually seen.  I certainly would like to speak-up as an advocate for a return to common sense simplicity, and give humanity a better alternative to believe in, with a far brighter distant-future.  After I return from a brief vacation, I will try to add-in illustrations to this blog.

I would like to cover restoring entropy in my next blog, and explain why our closed universe looks as “youthful and energetic” {barely a day over 13.7 billion years old} that the big bang supposes.  I often cringe when I see specials on TV spouting such preposterous views on our universe which so clearly do not make sense, and do not agree with our daily experiences.  I would like to champion a return to having Conservation of Energy as a fundamental pillar of physics, and not have it so clearly disregarded as modern thinking has gotten-away-with since at least 1929.

As always, your comments and questions are welcome.

This section of the blog, last modified June 22, 2009.

The first major difference, is that a conventional theory black hole is assumed to collapse into a singularity, a mathematically difficult to understand (and theoretically impossible to understand), infinitely dense, minimally small (assumed to be around a Planck length, or 10^-42 Meter in length), with not the slightest degree of proof.  For this reason, and more, the C-R theory claims that a standard black hole is strictly imaginary, or a creative construct, as-in: a work of fiction.

On the other hand, the Comedy-Recycling Theory claims that no Black-Hole ^C-R ever collapses into a singularity, because of the newly-understood nature of the cause of gravity.  Every C-R theory (brand name) Black-Hole ^C-R has two distinct parts, an inner Active Zone ^C-R {the shaded gray} and an outer portion or Neutral Zone ^C-R {depicted in orange}.

The innermost part, the Active Zone ^C-R has the following properties.  It is always completely closed-off, and always exactly critical, with exactly enough matter, at a sufficient density, to close-off, or close-up that part of space.  It is not coincidental, but merely the starting requirement to initially create a Black-Hole ^C-R.  Once this volume is created, it is “sealed-off”, and both isolated and insulated from the outside world.  This allows curvature, a geometric-like (or space-time metric-like) bending, to pass through (or twist-out-of) space-time, and still be effective outside, without needing any emission of electromagnetic energy (or speed-of-light based radiation).  This curvature then “causes” gravity, as an (after)effect, not like a true “force” which would directly initiate the action. {Gravity is the result we notice, because-of this action of curvature upon matter, allowing stored-up energy to “seep-out” from matter and only then, to cause the acceleration, but not the direct cause of the action.)  This distinction is very important, as: Once ALL energy is extracted, NO MORE acceleration can be produced, or will show-up.

The second part of the brand name Black-Hole ^C-R is even more interesting: the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  The Neutral Zone ^C-R is any portion of space-time where the escape velocity is OVER (greater than) the speed-of-light!!!  Inside this volume, all electromagnetic activity is: “turned-off”, held in abeyance, shut-down, put-to-sleep, or inactivated. [Tied-up in knots, as in KNOT active, pun-wise.] Both matter and energy still exist, but they “cannot experience  real-time” or participate in any “speed-of-light” type-of interaction.  Think of energy (light) shut-down, or “frozen in time”, tied in loopy-knots, “Resonating-In-Place” {R.I.P.}, or in a “0” mode, as compared to the digital “1” mode experienced by all matter and energy in the Active Zone ^C-R, active in real-time.

NOTE: The relative size of the Neutral Zone ^C-R shown in the illustration is greatly exaggerated (though it can vary, and will increase with time).  Most Neutral Zone’s C-R will be much thinner as compared to the inside active area.  The central Inner Active Zone ^C-R will never change or increase in size after it forms.  That gives the Black-Hole ^C-R a type of anchor, or a placeholder inside, and the outer Neutral Zone ^C-R insulates that inside portion from the day-to-day business of eating more mass.  All of the increase in mass for the Black-Hole ^C-R will show up only in the Neutral Zone ^C-R.

NOTE: Once matter passes-through, into this Neutral Zone ^C-R, it is at the minimum-possible gravitational energy level.  No further gravitational “attraction”, or inward acceleration, is possible.  The attraction of “gravity” is thus disabled, or prevented from causing any further collapse inward.  Matter from the Neutral Zone ^C-R cannot “fall” inward, into the Active Zone ^C-R, without acquiring more energy!!!  Since it does not have this energy and cannot acquire any while “inactivated”, inward collapse is prevented and completely shut-down.

Matter, and energy, while in the Neutral Zone ^C-R cannot: Interact, Absorb, Emit, Radiate, Decay radioactively, or Communicate, but they still exist. [with matter kind-of “sleeping”, “dreaming”, and energy resonating-at “the-speed-of-light” {without going anywhere, effectively rolling in small-loops, or sub-dimensions, or “out-of-the-plane”}.”

* A C-R theory joke here would be, this light-speed-limited energy would be trapped in “legal-whole-loops”, rather than legal-loop-holes.  (Similar-to a dog on a race-track, chasing it’s tail, running in a stationary circle, at full speed, when it should instead be running a race around the track at that speed to win.)

In effect, the Neutral Zone ^C-R can consume and concentrate matter and energy, and store-it-up, inactivated (so that it cannot escape) without radiating anything—ever!!!  In short, a 100% effective “cold-storage”, will re-concentrate matter and energy. After a complete release, this will RESTORE ENTROPY after the escape velocity in this volume of space-time twists-back below the “speed-of-light”.  The outer boundary of the Neutral Zone ^C-R is the Schwarzschild radius of the Black-Hole ^C-R, and the inner boundary is a second Schwarzschild radius beginning at the start of the inner Active Zone ^C-R, where real-time, or “speed-of-light” activity is once again permitted.
See diagram(s) above.

HINT: Our universe IS the giant-sized Active Zone ^C-R of this universe-sized “inside” of a Black-Hole ^C-R, hence it is the IDEAL lab-model for study.  ALL of the properties that the C-R theory attributes to the inside Active Zone ^C-R of EVERY Black-Hole ^C-R are present and visible within our universe.

NOTE: It is NOT accidental that the Neutral Zone ^C-R stores-up, in an inactivated state, concentrated and trapped amounts of both matter and energy.  This is why the C-R theory insists that Black-Holes ^C-R do not EVER emit Hawking radiation from the inside, and they never decay away over time.  The release of this inside energy is eventually accomplished, in every Nova, supernova, quasar, Seyfert galaxy, and GRB observed.  This catastrophic and total  release is much more efficient (100% thermodynamically efficient) than Hawking radiation.

NOTE: The existence of cosmic rays, those high energy (mostly) POSITIVE charges zipping around this universe, are evidence-of a C-R theory-like energy-release process going on in this universe.  Just last year (2008) scientists measured a naturally-generated cosmic ray with at least 300 quintillion electron-volts of energy, an outrageous amount of energy for a particle to acquire from almost every known process, except a C-R theory-like energy release event!!!

Part of the C-R theory hypothesis is that every Black-Hole ^C-R that is eating matter and energy is, just for pun , a mass-sieve (or massive) body.  It preferentially (i.e., BY MASS) sorts, seizes, and swallows the more massive nucleus.  The proton, the neutron, and/or the combination of both is eaten by the Black-Hole ^C-R, and this nucleus passes through the Schwarzschild radius, and is then stored-up in an inactivated mode, where the volume of space-time has the escape-velocity OVER (greater-than) “the speed-of-light”.

Almost all, if not ALL of the light-weight electrons escape ingestion.  Therefore, ALL matter-eating Black-Holes ^C-R should be found with an abundance of escaping excess electrons outside.  It is probably this self-repelling group of electrons which accounts for the complete reversal momentum or infalling matter, and the near-light speed of outflowing jets of radiation (powered-by these self-repelling electrons).  

NOTE: If these electrons are not found, or if they are not the primary source of the energy for the outflowing jets, then the C-R theory is probably wrong!!!

NOTE:  There is nothing in the properties of the accretion disks noticed outside many Black-Holes ^C-R to account-for or create the near-light-speed jetstreams. (The accretion disks could create enormous temperatures from sliding-type friction.)  The accretion disks are merely the closest “innocent bystanders”, blamed for the “crimes”.  (But the C-R theory claims, the “charges” won’t stick!!!)

NEW JOKE:  Question: Why do electrons leaving the Black-Holes ^C-R travel in jets?  Answer: Because propeller planes take too long!!!

For more detailed information and explanations, please check out portions of the C-R theory such as Chapters 2 and 3, and other sections.  See also the sections involving the known electrical phenomenon which suggest that massive electrical imbalances occur in this universe, far in excess of what would be expected in a mostly neutral, electrically equalized, conventional theory-obeying universe.

The video shot Tuesday should be available on-line shortly.  This blog is to highlight some of the ideas touched-upon in the video, but to give more depth to the new readers and viewers.  I hope those viewing will take the lesser nut (the one in front, with the blue hat on) more seriously, after reading some of this blog.

The events, as described, either: are going on, or they are not.  The visual evidence either should support the C-R theory hypothesis, or it should clearly refute it, when viewed over time.  The C-R theory ideas are definitely not believed by conventional theories, so they are not being “looked-for” either.  I would like to offer the C-R theory as a new alternative theory to those readers and viewers coming aboard for the first time, and for those intrigued enough to be repeat visitors.

I would hope that some will consider the C-R theory’s ideas seriously, and look at the visual evidence all around us.  Electrical activity abounds, and conventional theories do not offer mechanisms to suggest possible causes, or valid predictions.  The C-R theory, on the other hand, does predict enormous electrical activity outside ALL Black-Holes ^C-R dining on matter, and on activities thought to be connected to runaway thermonuclear fusion and fission, such as novas and supernovas.  The continuous expansion of supernovas, measured long after the adiabatic cooling resulting from that expansion should have occurred, should clue-in scientists (and others) that something beyond the expected is ongoing.

This blog covers more material than was possible to address in the several brief video segments.  I hope that interested viewers/readers will delve into the C-R theory for further information, and to flesh-out the ideas more completely.