# Saturday, December 20, 2008

A response to the article, "Did our cosmos exist before the big bang?" in the December issue of "New Scientist" magazine.

Dear Sirs,

In response to your article (Dec. 13-19, 2008, page #32) on the Recycled Universe, and your joy over the elimination of one of the problems with the Big Bang (starting solely from a singularity), I would offer an alternative "new" theory that eliminates ALL of the problems with the Big Bang. I would like to tout The Comedy-Recycling Theory (of the Entire Known Universe) as an even better alternative.

The real problems with understanding the Big Bang consist of two major errors science has bought into, virtually without challenge or discussion. The first is the acceptance of the expansion of the universe. Hubble did find increasing red-shift with increasing distances of galaxies starting in the late 1920's.

The small problem was, this was not EVER reconciled with the EXCEPTION, the Great Attractor, where blue-shifts increase, up to a point. The only way to reconcile these is to accept that most of the redshifts and blueshifts observed are gravity-based (curvature caused). Essentially, our universe is a CLOSED universe, with a "preferred reference frame" mandatorily superimposed over it. The blueshifted area runs faster then here on earth, or more correctly, we are farther from the center, and we are slowed-down more than the center. Further outside our location, red-shifts continue to increase, all the way out to the outer edge.

Notice, this means that, contrary to the Theory of Relativity’s claims, there is not like here, timewise. The "Great Attractor" runs faster than earth, and everywhere further out from the center of this universe than earth is more redshifted to us. Note, this greatly simplifies understanding our universe, as is seen. This means that the type 1a supernova used as "standard candles" of brightness are not standard, but differ timewise in brightness from the center to the outer edges.

Surprisingly, the outer volumes of our universe are worth less energy, and therefore cannot collapse inward without picking-up more energy, which they do not have, and cannot obtain. This makes our universe perfectly stable (not expanding, and not expanding at an expanding rate, either). Note: This immediately solves the horizon problem, and explains the flatness problem. This also explains simply why our universe appears very close to omega, (appearing to be almost full of matter) because it always is exactly full. Note: this solution also does not need either "dark energy" , or" something from nothing", to continually fill, expand, and accelerate our universe.

Based on the principle of Occams’ razor, the C-R theory uses simpler ideas to accomplish and explain our universe, as we actually see it. All the major problems (5 unexplained anomalies) with the Big Bang disappear.

Although experts will disagree, and whine about violating the second law of thermodynamics, the C-R theory takes care of that objection, too, but I will leave that out of this letter. I would offer www.cr-theory.org/pdf/aprilfoolingscience.pdf

as specific alternative and improved theory to replace the big bang, or simply www.cr-theory.org as a much better overall explanation of our universe for your magazine’s readers.

Jerry Reynard (author: C-R theory)

Here is a link to the article http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20026861.500-did-our-cosmos-exist-before-the-big-bang.html

Saturday, December 20, 2008 4:19:47 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  | 
# Tuesday, January 01, 2008
12/20/2008 Letter to the Editor of the New Scientist Magazine
1/1/2009 Happy New Year
1/2/2009 Continuation of blog (January 2, 2009)
1/20/2009 Double Negative Ionization of Our Sun's Photosphere
2/2/2009 The Video
2/7/2009 An Experiment for Viewers of the Feb. 17th Nova Program on PBS
3/27/2009 Dark Energy Hunt
4/1/2009 New Video - April Fooling Science Twice
4/8/2009 A C-R Theory Joke
4/14/2009 The Big Nut
6/22/2009 A Closed Universe is our home
7/8/2009 Technical details from some of the C-R theory video shoots
7/29/2009 Viewer Comments
8/11/2009 New Videos and More
8/29/2009 Fishtank Physics
9/4/2009 An Experiment of Gravity that Anyone can do at Home
9/21/2009 A Second Follow-up to the original follow-up on the Experiment in Gravity Anyone can do at Home
10/10/2009 Is there a connection between some or ALL of these known phenomena and the C-R theory?
12/17/2009 Conclusion of the last blog entry, "Is there a connection between some or ALL of these known phenomena and the C-R theory?"
2/6/2010 Another Theory Arrives at Same Conclusions by Different Means
3/4/2010 The C-R Theory Responds
3/31/2010 A comment on Hypography Forum discussing: How Does Gravity escape from a black hole?
3/31/2010 April-Fooling Science Twice: How "Science" got "April-fooled" Twice , and remains so until this day.
5/31/2010 Celebration of 20000th Visitor and More
7/3/2010 The W.I.R.D.A.R.D. Principle
7/4/2010 The most Outrageous Anomaly Known to Science
9/12/2010 What the C-R theory would like to offer Home Readers
10/25/2010 Welcome to Our 25,000th Visitor
11/23/2010 NASA Gives the C-R theory an "unintentional" gift for the Holidays, and it is just what we've always wanted and needed
12/17/2010 Key Ideas of the C-R Theory
1/12/2011 Slow and Steady into the New Year
3/30/2011 Response to Reader Questions
5/1/2011 "May I" Reset the Record?
6/6/2011 The Difficulty
7/12/2011 Foundations
9/5/2011 Phenomenal Finds
11/5/2011 CR Theory Takes on the Weirdest Objects in the Cosmos
12/31/2011 Commentary on the 50 Weirdest Objects in the Cosmos Continues
Tuesday, January 01, 2008 10:22:06 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |