.

 

       First off, I would like to celebrate the C-R theory’s 20,000^th visitor.  I cheated just a little bit to get that honor, myself.  I checked-in when it was at 19,998, and I refreshed a couple times within the next five minutes thereafter.  There were many initial months that the site ran without a counter, so the real number of visitors is higher.

       I would like to thank those thousands who have visited, and I would especially like to thank those who have repeatedly re-visited.  I hope that I can aid more of you home readers in your quest for improved understanding. 

       I realize the difficulty some have with accepting these new ideas, and I am continually trying to re-present these unique ideas in new, fresh ways, with new “spin”, and with new references to items in the headlines.

       I also apologize that there is no pre-agreed-upon language to fully express some of these new concepts.  They are just too new to have a common reference understood and accepted by all readers.

       I would like to revise my blog strategy, and discuss why I believe that the C-R theory is relevant, and why it might be worth your while to read it carefully.  The C-R theory is my humble attempt to communicate a really NEW way of thinking about gravity, it’s true cause, and to share something important which I believe has been completely missed almost everywhere else.

       The C-R theory is something-like “informed speculation”, rather than a strict, by-the-book, attempt at theory.  I have been trying to share that our entire universe is quite probably the inside of a giant (universe) sized Black-Hole ^C-R.  As such, one of it’s most interesting properties is that our universe is completely closed-off inside.  This “forces-upon” all of the contents inside, a “preferred reference frame”. {with minimum gravitational curvature at the center [the blueshifted area], and maximum curvature everywhere at the outermost edges, just beyond our visual ability to detect, because-of a complete time stoppage.}

       The real significance of this can only be appreciated by considering a much smaller example of a time-rate change that is “known about”, but not widely covered.  I’ll start-off there.

       Home readers can access web-sites about the GPS satellites, where they can find out that the satellites orbiting some 20,200 km. above the earth gain about 45.5 usec every 24 hours from residing in a slightly lesser level of curved gravity.

(The satellites also slow-down by a bit over 18 usec per day, due to their higher orbital speeds, giving them each a net time-gain of around 38.5 usec. per day.)  Ground controllers then “correct” this time-gain-offset, and cause the satellites to “intentionally-miscount” (therefore, actually correct-for) this real time-gain, as if they were residing snugly on earth’s surface, in that same ground-level time-frame as the GPS user on the ground.

       By understanding that concept from one small item that we do know-about, I next would like to extend that same need to consider a time-rate-adjustment “Universe-wide”.  (Something-like, measuring the thickness of one sheet of paper, and trying to extend that small insight to understand some of the complexities of all of the forests in North America, or the whole world.)

       What I have never seen covered anywhere else is a realization that, if our universe is “closed”, then just such a “preferred-reference-frame” gravitational slowdown is required of ALL the contents inside this type-of a universe.  The amount of the effect varies in proportion to their distance from the center.  This also means that most-of the phenomena we see in this universe are all seen at a real-time rate.  They appear as they occurred, and events do not need to be corrected, time-wise. (the darker areas of the small graphic of half of our universe are really much slower, just as they appear)  (HINT: We on earth are not at the center of the graphic, but somewhere in the white area near the center [the white areas are all equal in time-rates].)

NOTE: Equal color areas in the diagram are also equal in their time-rates, whether slowed-down or speeded-up to us.

       The easy way to tell where the “center of this universe” is, it will be the only place everyone sees that has the maximum rate of blueshift to us.  This blueshifted location happens to be called “The Great Attractor”. 

       “The Great Attractor” is supposed to have such a large mass there that it is sucking earth, and everything closer-in to it, towards that location. {Hence, the “expected blueshift.”}  Science has also failed to find any indication of a sufficient amount-of mass located there to accomplish this prodigious feat.

       Everywhere else, further outside of earth’s vicinity [measured from the center], will be more slowed-down (or redshifted) to us.  This redshift is known-about, but is widely believed to be caused as a remnant of the Big Bang, and is thought to be Doppler-shifted, due-to the accelerating expansion.  Because of this ASSUMPTION, the redshifts have been erroneously “corrected” to attempt-to “restore their true nature”.

       Five or six indications that this “correction of observed-data” might be a mistake is for all of the un-caused anomalies needed to make this Big-Bang derived universe make sense.  That the C-R theory can eliminate ALL of them may be a stronger point in it’s favor.  Occams’ razor states that the simplest theory that fits is most-likely to be correct.

       Not to brag too much, but is it easier to explain why an entire universe is accelerating in it’s expansion, or to correct that perception, and show what is really happening?  The C-R theory is one of the few to attempt the latter method.

       The C-R theory claims that our universe is completely contained (inside), static (expansion-wise), very dynamic in interactions permitted, perfectly stable, and well-suited to recycling both matter and energy.  You can read-through some of my earlier blogs for more coverage on those ideas.

       A few months ago, I ran across an interesting article, about 18 pages long, from Wikipedia, about Jupiter’s Magnetosphere, and I thought I’d like to share the link with interested home readers.

Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetosphere_of_Jupiter  

(This article may be edited later on, and some sections or ideas removed or glossed-over, or revised, to make it less useful to the C-R theory.  Archive the article in it’s present state, if possible, before it changes-away.)

       (I had intended to remark upon this article a few months sooner, but had other things come up, first.)

       The article is mostly a simple summary about Jupiter’s Magnetosphere, and it had some very interesting items (from the C-R theory hypothesis) within.  One of the foremost was that, the net sum of energy emissions from all of Jupiter’s aurorae was 300 tera-watts (TW).  There is an interesting small box about halfway down the 18 page article, listing the various emission bands, summarizing Jupiter’s respective energy outputs for each of those bands.

       The C-R theory would like to remind scientists in their search for the non-existent Dark Matter, instead of looking for something that does not exist, why not try to look for what IS known-about.  Just look at ALL of the stray electromagnetic energy apparent within this humble solar system of ours, with the conditions around Jupiter as a prime example.  HINT: Most of this electrical-type phenomenon MUST have a cause, or a REASON to exist.

       There is a cyclical current flowing between Jupiter and it’s moon Io, sometimes as high as 5,000,000 amps, with up to 400,000 volts across the face of Io itself.  There are enormous magnetic fields, and electrical currents, too. {Comment: Almost every planet, with the possible exceptions of Mercury and Pluto (which now, officially, may not even BE a planet anymore), has some known aurora type storms.}  The linked-to article even mentioned that Jupiter’s moon Ganymede has been observed with auroral activity.

       I read elsewhere about a single storm raging on Saturn that has been continuously observed for months, which emits more than 3,000 times the level-of radio emissions of the worst, most intense earth-type storms.  All of these aurora-type phenomenon look like they are electrical in nature.

       IRONIC NOTE: If there is this much electrical activity “right under our noses” in our home solar system (earth’s “back yard”), then how much more collective “electrical activity” might there be galaxy-wide, with billions of stars, at least some of which are very “sun-like”?  Can these collective electromagnetic outputs account for most, or all of the “anomalies” in galaxy star-velocities which science readily admits is NOT “caused entirely by the influence of  standard gravity”?

       Could this simple electrical and magnetic activity be the cause of the much higher radial-velocities measured in outlying stars in galaxy arms?  Do these electromagnetic currents “drive the motor”, so to speak, that holds (and maybe rotates) galaxy arms together in spite-of their spin (or, their rotational velocity), and drives their higher velocity (than can be provided-for by gravity)?

       Might it not make more sense to search out and study these electrical type of events listed above, before questing off to search for Dark Matter, which is plainly lacking in any and all near-earth observations conducted so far?

       Without taking my word for it, I would encourage the home readers to do their own, independent searches (free of a selected pro-C-R theory bias) on electrical activities within galaxies, using Google, Bing, Yahoo, and/or any other of their favorite search engines.  Here is a potential partial list to search-for indications of electrical activity already known about, but not-yet “connected-in” {pun: plugged-in} or understood by mainstream science:

1. High energy free electrons emerging from galaxy centers

2. Cosmic rays (positive charges) released from galaxies or supernovae

3. Quasar emissions and galaxy-Black Hole ^C-R connections

4. Collimated jets of “something” emerging from Black-Holes ^C-R at nearly light speed

HINT: Gee, I wonder how easy it could be for a KNOWN force [electricity] to accelerate away two pure streams of excess electrons from a Black-Hole ^C-R at nearly the speed of light?

5. Where is polarized light (and other em-band frequencies, too) seen, and WHAT polarizes that light?

6.  What level of electrical activity is indicated by the amount(s) of polarized light seen in various locations?  HINT: It is enormous, whatever it is.

 

       I had a short list of some 69 different electrical phenomenon unlinked or unconnected by mainstream science in my October 2009 blog.  There are many items there the interested reader can look through and evaluate.  My contention is that they are all related, C-R theory-wise, to help us try to see what is really going-on in the universe.  They suggest a pattern of large-scale electromagnetic interactions completely unexpected by standard theory.

 

       After doing an independent search, the readers should note that there is a tremendous amount of relatively-nearby electrical-type activity for an “electrically neutral universe”.  Maybe that assumption of overall electrical neutrality is mostly wrong?  The C-R theory is one of the few theories to have a ready-made causative mechanism, {offering the creation-of ABUNDANT, stray electrical charges}, which is available to explain why free electrical charges are seen in such abundance almost everywhere we look.

       The next question is, if the C-R theory type mechanisms are occurring, is the level or quantity of freed-up charges then reasonable as compared to the real-world we see?  I would ask the home reader to answer that question after doing their own independent search on the above items.  I believe their answer will be an obvious YES.

       Let me state possible numbers here, just for our sun.  A widely-accepted number for the number of hydrogen atoms undergoing fusion each second is 4 x 10³⁸.  If the process of falling into the Black-Hole ^C-R is at least 20 times as energy efficient per encounter, then divide that number of atoms by 20 (the number for efficiency increase per atom could be as high as 80) = 2 x 10³⁷.  To make that number more manageable, divide by Avogadro’s number, 6.02 x 10²³ and arrive at approximately 33 billion amps.

       Divide those 33 billion amps by the 1 ten-billionth of our sun’s total energy earth’s surface area receives, and allow for some magnetic field sweep-ups or herding of nearby earth-volumes of electrons, say, up to 30 earth-diameters out (concentrating a volume of 900 times the size of earth’s surface collecting area) would yield a possible 2800 amps of continuous charge for planet earth alone.  NOTE (Although the volume was swept-out, only the surface area increase would increase the counted charges.  Measuring the depth-away would not increase the numbers by the cube, only the square.)

       Overall, I would recommend using this Wikipedia article on Jupiter’s Magnetosphere to search-for some practical results that can enhance your understanding of: Why the C-R theory ideas on electrical activity connections might have real-world applicability.

 

       I also ran into another fairly large book-to-be presentation (~160 pages) about an attempt to explain this universe using curvature, titled Curvature Cosmology, by David F. Crawford. http://davidcrawford.bigpondhosting.com/index_files/cc2.pdf   

       This author relates his unsuccessful attempts to publish an article in several magazines supporting his efforts at using and plotting curvature to explain observations.  It is a bit over 1 Mb, and was recently updated (in March, 2009).  For those looking for equations, and a fuller, more scholarly (mathematical) treatment of curvature, this looks like an interesting presentation.  While not quite as “radical” as the C-R theory, this individual seems to have had a very hard time getting those referees in the science-publishing industry to find some merit in his attempts.  (It is a dryer reading, however, and may be way too technically complex and long for the average, home reader.)

       I am certainly supportive of anyone else realizing that curvature may play a much bigger part in understanding our universe than is suspected elsewhere.  I do not believe this author realizes yet that our entire universe might be affected, system-wide.  I would like to offer readers other resources to help them understand curvature.  The book also talks-about the reluctance in the media to even consider this “curvature-idea” as noteworthy.

 

       There are also some new magazine articles that might be worth discussing in my next blog.

       I have some upcoming blogs ready to discuss some new thoughts on the W.I.R.D.A.R.D. Principle (When In Rome, Do As Romans Do).  This speculates on light’s ability to conform it’s speed to whatever media (glass, water, a vacuum) it travels-through, and how that may “mask” the changing of lightspeed elsewhere in the universe.

       Lastly, I would like to re-emphasize the unique understanding possessed by the C-R theory as to a practical method of how the C-R theory “brand-name” Black-Holes ^C-R help to reverse entropy in this universe.  Only the C-R theory understands how the Black-Hole ^C-R, with it’s Neutral Zone ^C-R located immediately inside the Schwarzschild radius can concentrate matter and energy in a time-neutralized manner, but with the potential to recover 100% of everything ever eaten by the Black-Hole ^C-R if one has the overall patience to wait, and let nature take it’s course.

       The process is so simple, yet so genius in it’s practicality and ingenuity, it suggests (but does not prove) a Designer.  The C-R theory maintains that it is no accident that our universe has plenty of energy to go around, and there is NO danger of our running-out anytime in the foreseeable future.

       NOTE: I do not claim to have invented this method above, but merely claim that I have been allowed or permitted to understand it or to notice it, and to share that new understanding with you home readers.

       It is the “system-wide package” of understanding that allows the C-R theory to make such a bold statement.  Our universe IS the inside of a “universe-sized” Black-Hole ^C-R.  It is not expanding, but static.  It will always be exactly-full, and will always have a critical inside density.  It cannot possibly collapse.

       Time does vary by location, and it also varies by distance from the center.  Time is DEFINITELY-NOT isotropic, or the same in all directions.

       The design of the universe is such that it cannot collapse “gravitationally”, because the matter at the outermost edges is worth less energy there than matter closer-in to the center.  It always is that way, and always will be that way.  The majority of the redshifts we see are (time-rate based) gravitational redshifts, with some rotational Doppler shifting going on near galaxy centers.

       The old “Newtonian-ideas” about gravity simply do not apply.  Those ideas were based on a simple summation of the forces, as understood by equations (written on paper).  They were very successful for many years, but have some real limitations. 

       The C-R theory says that it is “curvature” that causes the acceleration.  It does this by re-arranging (or redistributing) some-of the energy from the overall rest-mass when decreasing the real-time energy by exchanging the “energy-difference” into kinetic energy.  No external energy source is ever needed.*  ABSOLUTELY NO energy ever leaks-out from inside a Black-Hole ^C-R.  Also, no knowledge of the internal accumulation of electrical charge (even if those charges are “switched-off, time-wise”) can be communicated-out from a Black-Hole ^C-R, either.

*That means that the mass that creates the curvature DOES NOT need to create or provide-for the gravitational energy “in advance-of the encounter”, or need to account-for the exact amount of energy needed.  It is the mass itself that provides (exchanges) it’s own “internal” energy, hence a very complete internal-auditing is maintained.

       Curvature, a kind-of dimensional warping, or distortion, is present outside of a Black-Hole ^C-R, but there is no “speed-of-light based causative mechanism” to do so.  It is more-like a (geo)metric thing.  HINT: To imagine this “dimensional type-of communication” instead of using words, think if I communicated my intent to you by kicking you in the seat of your pants instead of talking to you.  That is something-like how curvature works to communicate and cause “gravity”.

       NOTE: The curvature directly causes the action of gravity instead-of being a product-of or aftermath-of the initial action of gravity. {The curvature is the cause, the gravity is the after-effect, or the result after the action.}

       There is a complete difference in action between the two different inverse-square forces {gravity and electromagnetism} outside of a Black-Hole ^C-R.  Standard theory has ASSUMED that those two forces started-out the same at the singularity (around 10⁹⁶ degrees), but then broke-symmettry (after temperatures fell to around 10³⁰ degrees), and act the same.  Quantum theory more or less expects both forces use the same overall mechanism to communicate, and the same paths to “escape”.

       The C-R theory INSISTS that no speed-of-light based knowledge ever escapes from a Black-Hole ^C-R.  This is not a BAD thing though, but part of the plan, and part of the usefulness of the Black-Hole ^C-R, as compared to a lousy conventional black hole.  By accumulating both matter and radiated energy in a time-frozen method, with absolutely no leakage-out, the Black-Hole ^C-R becomes 100% thermodynamically efficient at recycling energy.

       NOTE: This method insists on mostly catastrophic-failure type energy releases, resulting in a nova, supernova, quasar, Seyfert galaxy, and GRB.

       The Black-Hole ^C-R becomes a kind-of anchor at the center of a galaxy, but also a garbage disposal and an “emission source” of refreshed and renewed matter.

       SECOND NOTE: Only the C-R theory maintains that the second law of thermodynamics does not (or cannot) apply to the Neutral Zone ^C-R of the Black-Hole ^C-R, because of the “no real-time nature” inside the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  (The Neutral Zone ^C-R is the volume of the inside of the Black-Hole ^C-R where the escape velocity is above the speed-of-light.  This effectively “traps” energy in an inactive, incommunicative, neutralized state, or, “out of the plane” as we measure time, light, and energy.

       HINT: Think of a fish (in the air), trapped in a fishnet unable to “swim” in water, or of a greyhound chasing it’s own tail in circles, instead of running a race to win (around the dog track).  Also: Think of a piggy bank, which must be broken to recover any of it’s contents.  All of these examples present aspects of the Neutral Zone ^C-R.

       By understanding such simple concepts, the C-R theory tries to gain a truer picture of real-world events.  ALL of the major anomalies arising from the Big Bang scenario disappear, or are no longer needed.  The entire universe becomes humanly-understandable again, or is at least more-so than mainstream science allows.

       I would recommend trying to think in simple terms again, using known concepts, to understand our universe.  There are many areas I have oversimplified in this short blog presentation.  I would recommend trying to read some of the areas of either of the C-R theory presentations.  Only by thinking about this universe as a full system-package can one start to grasp the underlying simplicity and organization that the C-R theory is trying to showcase.  I am trying to help home readers re-understand this universe, and take on a new view as to what we notice and where we look.

       Please think of the C-R theory as something like a new field-guide, showing you how to recognize certain events and processes, pointing-out new items in contexts not yet considered by mainstream science.

       Thank you for letting the C-R theory try to become your “Theory of Choice” when choosing a theory to understand the universe-by.  I do apologize that I had to make so many differences between the C-R theory and standard theories.  I do realize that many will not accept these ideas at their first presentation.  If it takes you a few re-visits to warm-up to these ideas, that is expected.

       All I would ask is to give the C-R theory a fair chance to be evaluated.  If it has weaknesses, let us find them and fix them, or reject this theory and try something else.

       I welcome any home-readers to use what they can of this theory, and try to find new uses for it that I have not-yet thought-of or noticed.  If it is correct, I expect there to be many as-of-yet unnoticed new phenomenon that will fit into the overall patterns suggested by the C-R theory quite nicely.  If this is not the case, then the theory may need to be revised, modified, polished-up, or discarded.

       I have chosen to “give-away” these ideas for free, not because that is their “true-value”, but because freely giving away these ideas will remove some of the first barriers against their adoption.  If I did not believe these ideas had merit, I certainly would not have posted them on the internet.

       I am still learning how to apply these ideas, and finding new areas where they seem to go along with new discoveries.  I would like home readers to look for C-R type patterns of electromagnetic energy interactions.  Can we challenge the perception that this universe should be electrically neutral?  Do Black-Holes ^C-R really create electrical imbalances in every interaction?  If ordinary black holes do exist, this universe should be much more electrically neutral.

       I am counting-on the long term inevitable discovery of the amount of electrical interactions generated by every Black-Hole ^C-R.  If outrageous quantities of stray electrons are not found almost everywhere we look at where a Black-Hole ^C-R is feeding, the C-R theory MUST BE wrong.

       If ex-Black-Hole ^C-R energy-release events do not free-up tremendous quantities of freed positive charges, the C-R theory also must be wrong.

       PLEASE, when science finally “pulls it’s head out of the sand”, and notices this electrical activity, REMEMBER that you heard-about it here, first.  Only the C-R theory is sticking it’s proverbial “neck” on the chopping block, and demanding that such electrical activities SHOULD be going-on.  If they are not, the C-R theory is wrong.

       If there is any “easy” test of the C-R theory, demand excess electrons outside every eating Black-Hole ^C-R, and demand freed positive charges released from novae, supernovae, quasars, GRB’s and the like, powering their continuing, accelerating expansion.

       If you think you are starting to understand these new ideas, I would appreciate your passing them along to others, too.  I could use your help in trying to show others how fully useful these ideas seem to be.

       Thanks,

Jerry A. Reynard