IS there any connection between the C-R theory type
processes and Some or All of these Known Phenomenon listed below?
(Do any or all of these items hint
that at least some parts of the C-R theory are Right?) Can the C-R theory make
a real contribution to understanding the operation of our real world, just as
it is seen?
I would like to list some of the recognized
items that are known-about, which may help to demonstrate a possible connection
or link to the C-R theory. It is conceivable that some of these are not
connected in any way, but that is why I want to list many to give you, the home
reader, some ideas of where the C-R theory may help-out our common understanding,
in recognizing some common threads not seen as relevant (or interlinked) by
mainstream science. I intentionally left the list LARGE, both to
be noticed, and to be overwhelming in it’s claims for C-R theory’s
relevance. I took out other items, like speculations and some predictions, and
saved them for the next part (continuation) of this blog. Part II can
contribute even more items I’ve noticed (but not known phenomena) to the C-R
theory’s claims.
I have divided the below-listed
items into sections, grouped by: Earth, Sun (and vicinity), Space,
Black-Holes C-R, supernova, and an end section,
followed by some comments. More will follow next week, including more ideas to
tie-in the items listed below, and list why they are relevant to the C-R
theory.
Statement: A brief, basic scenario for the C-R theory’s
suggested pathway: –
A Black-Hole C-R at the
center of our sun eats protons, and frees-up electrons outside the Black-Hole
C-R, to make the sun’s energy, instead of fusion.
This process is much more efficient
(possibly 80-150 times the energy released the same amount of matter) and
also allows many of the below items to be understood differently. (That
doesn’t prove it, but gives a demonstration of the practicality of the process,
and does simplify our understanding of what is going-on.
(--and our sun is probably not alone, star-wise, but will be
joined by countless quadrillions or more stars)
This basic CAUSE mechanism changes the
C-R theory’s expectations, and superimposes a "cause-effect" framework over
many of the below items in the next few sections.
Earth (and vicinity) ITEMS: (grouped below)
Earth-1. One of the most interesting items I found about 5
years ago was something I’d looked-for for a long time, (over 25 years) and
finally found out that it was "known-about" all along, but not well
publicized. On our sun’s photosphere, virtually ALL of the
hydrogen atoms there have 2 electrons!!! This is fairly
outrageous, since, on earth, when we heat-up a gas to 6,000 degrees C (or
almost 10,000° F) the gas usually LOSES it’s electron(s), and
ionizes positively. (Just like a neon sign)
The only way this might make good sense of this
situation is if there is a large, local source of excess negative charges (electrons)
in abundance. That situation is what the C-R theory claims might-well be the
case. {see earlier blogs for the reasons why}
Earth-2. If E-1 above is the case: There may well be a
very slight modulation of the sunspot activity by the collective orbits of the
planets ("The Jupiter Effect"). Such a wimpy force as gravity should have absolutely
no effect upon the rate of thermonuclear fusion, if that is causing our sun’s
power output. If a small Black-Hole C-R provided our sun’s power (extracting
E=mc2 type energy from hydrogen at 25-50% efficiency, vs. 0.7% for
fusion), the surrounding "cloud" of hydrogen and helium could be affected by contributions
from some planets, with their sleight gravitational-sloshing-around. NOTE: The
authors of the book The Jupiter Effect did repudiate the link, in a
follow-up book, because no possible causative mechanism was known.
Earth-3. By the C-R theory, at the center of the sun, excess
electrons are freed-up after the protons (and some proton-neutron combinations)
were "devoured" by the Black-Hole C-R. This might well allow those
electrons to jointly collimate (or bunch together) to flee the vicinity quickly,
and they would collectively emerge through the sun’s surface in flowing-spurting
"streams". The emerging electrons create those loops, whorls, arches, and
enormous magnetic fields we see as sunspots.*(find values if possible) Such
phenomenon are already well-known, but now, the C-R theory suggests the
internal causal mechanism for why it behaves this way?
Earth-4. Birkeland currents (folded currents) of at least
1,000,000 Amps (at 6.02 x 1023 electrons per amp each second) have
been measured in an aurora on earth. UNWRITTEN: Implies doubled amounts of
currents, if auroras are active in both hemispheres simultaneously.
Earth-5. NASA has measured instances of a current of
5,000,000 Amps between Jupiter and Io, and a voltage of 400,000 volts across
Io. That’s a pretty good trick for an "electrically neutral universe, huh?"
Those last 2 items are just what we know-of from within our solar system. www.nasm.si.edu/ceps/etp/jupiter/jupmag.html
How many more events like these
occur in other star’s systems, too?
HINT: Multiply out the full number of electrical charges,
and list that number, even more impressive (per each second). Up to 5,000,000 x
6.02 x 1023 electrons every second.
Earth-6. Earth’s thunder-storms generate tremendous
lightning currents (indicating some type of electrical activity on a regular,
continual basis). **(Jerry- get statistics, quantities, numbers, averages, and
add these in) Find #’s on a daily, hourly basis. Find the average number of thunderstorms
going on continuously.
Earth-7: Simply walk across a dry carpet indoors on a
winter’s day, and build-up a static charge of 3,500 volts, when you encounter a
doorknob. Why does this happen so easily? Maybe electrical charges are much
more abundant than allowed-for in standard scenario?
Earth-8. Biological organisms (especially people) feel
good in the presence of excess negative ions (like, right after a summer
rainstorm when the air smells so fresh). This IMPLIES this sense has been
around a very long time if human beings have a built-in coping mechanism to
deal with it or to enjoy it.
Earth- 9. Upper atmosphere sprites, imps, are relatively new
unknown charge events. These items were all found occurring above
thunderstorms, and only uncovered recently, not fully known-about. (They are
all very compatible with a C-R type process) Are there new insights or new
items to consider? No cause mechanism known or expected by conventional
theories.
Earth-10. Earth having 400,000 excess Coulombs, recharged
at 1,200-1,800 amps continuously. (As measured by von Helmholz around 1803)
Has this charge been there all along? Why is it not noted more often? NOTE:
Check ham radio sites too, for ionization ideas. They may note similar
phenomenon more often than anyone else.
Earth-11. People get headaches when they are exposed to
excess positive ions (think of a violent, nearby supernova release). They
might well go indoors and go to bed, or not stay outdoors as long. This might
be a possible protective mechanism from excessive exposure to harmful supernova
bursts, causing one to go in, and go to bed (safe in their "cave"), and stay
out of the deadly cosmic-ray shower outside.
Earth-12. Bees can sense the excess electrical charges on
flowers. Flowers which have been recently visited by other bees are not as
excessively charged as unvisited flowers. Some flowers build-up a charge over
time. This also implies that this has been around for millions of years, if
bees are adapted to it.
* Found a related article, that some plant’s leaves can reach
120 volts electrical potential (4 types of plants were specified)
Earth-13. Is there any more significance to the known
discontinuity at the earth’s Core Mantle Boundary? There could be a
gravitational discontinuity there, too. There is also a difference there
between the S & P type of wave couple-through? (Find name of discontinuity
{Check: The discontinuity is named for Beno Gutenberg!}) Only C-R suggests a
gravitational difference originating there, too. See __ in the C-R theory.
Earth-14. Time runs faster at Earth’s center than on
the surface. Can I prove it, demonstrate it, show someone else noticing it?
Is there any practical way to test it, without going there? Ping it? Would a radar
or sonar pulse directed there reveal-detect anything from the surface, here?
Is there an article by others suggesting the amount?
NOTE: Most theories suppose time runs slower at earth’s
center, from Newtonian understanding. A clear difference. C-R understands the
situation, is not referencing other-people’s expectations. The C-R
theory says maximum bending (as curvature) will be the maximum gravity spot, or
the Core Mantle Boundary. Curvature will be minimum at the earth’s center,
therefore, the curvature there (and time slowdown too) will be minimum. The
curvature MUST be less than on earth’s surface.
Earth-15. Extra corrosion in Alaska pipeline from Auroral
currents (way beyond the engineers initial expectations) Especially
concentrated in the polar regions. Not originally anticipated when pipeline
was built.
Earth-16. Aurora Borealis (and Australis) colors represent
ionized gasses (nitrogen, oxygen,…)
Earth-17. Comet’s tail (rapid change is visible in real
time) Can be seen from the earth as evidence of extremely rapid changes in
electrical (ionic) activity from the solar wind and magnetic fields. This
changes the position of the tail, and the modulation, a very quick response,
changes visibly as the tail shifts, flinchs, whips-around, and changes it’s position
almost instantly.
Earth-18. The space shuttle has been found to be glowing
green (from ionized oxygen atoms-ions) Something is ionizing those atoms. It
is not just the energy contribution from the orbital impact speed making the visible
glow.
Earth-19. Space shuttle tether melt-thru. (NOTE: A
space-tether melting also happened on the Russian shuttle’s tether experiment,
too) {Overload of 3500 volts @ at least 1 amp at the shuttle’s metal base} NASA
blamed "a defect in manufacturing of the cable’s insulation" (a pin-prick sized
air-bubble or hole) {They never considered that there was "just way too much electrical
energy available for any tether to handle."} [The C-R theory
suspects that there might be an especially large current surge when crossing
from the day to night side and back again while orbiting the planet.
(Find a link)
Earth- 20. The C-R theory claims that the "time-rate"
changes with the strength (or intensity) of the gravitational field (bending).
Already "known" but not believed or accepted. Only the C-R theory truly
appreciates the significance, and incorporates the idea into the "How" of how gravity
works.
NOTE: C-R may be unique in understanding-predicting the least
(or slowest) time-rate occurs at CMB on earth, where the bending, warping, or squeezing
from curvature is MAXIMUM.
Moon:
Moon-1. Maximum Gravity (as in curvature) is already at the
moon’s surface, and the curvature will decrease with depth towards the moon’s
center. Will it be noticed, by experimental result, within the next 20 years,
during any prolonged human visit to the moon? (and by astronauts from what
country(s)?) NOTE: The Apollo astronauts had great trouble with the moon-dust
getting into seals, gaskets, and other dust-sensitive areas. Now, I understand
that the gravity on the moon is already MAXIMUM at the surface. That means
that the moon-dust will not easily be pulled-off by gravity. Just the van der
waals forces (like the static electricity that holds-up a sweater-rubbed
balloon, to allow it to cling to a wall) would dominate.
SUN related ITEMS: (grouped below)
Sun- 1. The solar wind accelerates away after it
leaves the sun’s vicinity. That could imply or suggest that there is an excess
of electrical charges (electrons), self-repelling. (If extra-electrons are not
specifically looked for, it would be like taking a population census while
playing keep-away tag when you’re it, but you don’t know that you
are it, but the population being surveyed does. Your count may
be under-represented and have a hidden bias.)
Sun-2. The 11 year solar-sunspot cycles, are similar to the
period of Jupiter’s orbit around the sun. They may indeed be connected. See
item E-2
Sun-3. Auroral activities (like auroral rings) have been
observed on earth, Venus*(*on the night-side only), Saturn^ (^, two different
types of aurorae have been found on Saturn; An ultraviolet aurora, and also an
infrared aurora, at two distinct locations. They are believed to be caused by
two different mechanisms.), Uranus, Neptune, and Jupiter. Just recently, a
weak aurora has also been found on Mars, too. {Titan and Triton too?} Most solar-system
atmospheres have auroras. (I have not seen anything on Mercury, but the C-R
theory would not be surprised if Mercury had some-type of aurora, too.)
Sun-4. Scarcity (or shortfall) of neutrinos measured as coming
from our sun. At least 2/3 shortfall to expectations, but some manipulations
of "reality" are used to justify it. Current theory suggests the neutrinos
undergo a "neutrino-oscillation", switching or converting between the neutrino-types
that we can detect, and those we can’t detect. Wouldn’t it just be easier to
guess that all of the expected neutrinos just weren’t there, in the first
place?
Sun-5. Does the abundant electrical charge the C-R theory
suspects is coming from the sun contribute-to, enhance, maintain, or help stabilize
Saturn’s ring structure? Are there any unanticipated items to look for or
suspect? Would that extra-charge help-to stabilize and maintain the ring
structure, separate individual pieces, and space-them-out. Wrangle-them, but
not clump them, so to speak. Is there any "hidden" evidence in the known
spectrum data, but not yet looked-for? Are there any radio spectrum
measurements (known or unknown but available?) Check the literature.
Radio-ionization (music or sounds?)
Solar-sys-1. Sulphur volcanoes on Io, water-steam volcanoes
on Enceladus, two nitrogen spouting volcanoes on Triton, and volcanic features
found on Triton, (Neptune’s moon)?
Some volcanic features have been found on almost all solid
surfaces within the solar system. This implies that something may be heating
even smaller bodies, and giving them energy to melt.
Sun-6. Predict charge release magnitude for our sun. (need
a calculation and a number-range) not an observation, per se, but could be
matched to item #__ Show a ballpark figure, see if number is reasonable?
Could include up to 30 x 30 earth-diameters of volume-sweep from earth’s wide
magnetic field clearing-out the electrons from nearby space..
Sun-7. A thunderstorm on Saturn has been observed to
continue for at least 7 ½ months, with the storm covering at least 3,000 km in
diameter. Some radio waves were 10,000 times stronger than similar-type radio
waves emitted from earth’s thunderstorms.
SPACE related ITEMS (grouped below):
Space-1. Enormous amounts of polarized light (and other electromagnetic
radiation, covering all bands from radio, microwave, infrared, visible light,
ultraviolet, x-rays, and gamma rays) have been found just about everywhere.
This indicates the presence of enormous electrical or magnetic fields.
(everywhere in every direction) SOMETHING must be polarizing the light, and
guess WHAT does? Answer: Very high electrical currents, and/or high levels of
magnetic fields. {They can’t do it if they’re not there.}
Space- 2. There are four known stellar objects, stars
changing their class (on the H-R {Herzsprung-Russell) diagram) in intervals
shorter than human lifetimes. These events are supposed to take millions of
years according to standard thinking about fusion, but 4 stars have changed
several characteristics noticeably within human lifetimes.
V4334 SGR (in Sagittarius), also known as Sakurai’s Object.
(First observed Feb. 20, 1996)
V605 Aquilae, first observed in 1919
V 838 Mon (Monoceros)
FG Sagittae has been observed over 100 years, and changed
it’s color from B type to K2lb. It’s temperature has dropped every year by 250
K. It’s magnitude changed from 13.7 to 9.1, later down to 16, and back-up to
15 by Oct. 1998.
I would like to thank the Electrical Universe web-site
{link, too} for noticing the observations. If these 4 stars can change their
parameters this quickly, could our ideas about what type-of energy drives them
be at least partially wrong?
Space-3. Interstellar chemicals and radicals. If
high-energy currents are present, that changes the possibilities in space for
such interactions. Not just "your mother’s" old, cold, dark, dull, boring, outer
space anymore. Complex organic chemicals and molecules are found in abundance.
Space-4. Interstellar ions. Same idea as above, but
ionized radicals, too. Probably not freed by the energy from the 2.7K
background radiation, but do capture energy from cosmic rays zipping everywhere.
(Can I find a list of known interstellar ions?)
Space-5. Helium compounds in space. Something has to
provide the energy or incentive for helium, a normally-inert element on earth,
to combine and hook-up with interstellar radicals, or to form chemical
compounds. Helium compounds are more likely if there is a high level of
abundant energy occasionally available from cosmic rays. (probably not from the
2.7K background energy)
Space-6. Low hydrogen stars (Much less hydrogen in their
spectrum than science expects to see). These stars are thought to be "too
young" to be depleted of hydrogen this early in their lifetimes, by standard
theory. Maybe the standard H-R diagram isn’t as correct as it is supposed to
be?
Space-7. Excessive hydrogen stars (These stars have much
more hydrogen (and less heavy metals) than they should have, considering how
old they are supposed to be.) Maybe the H-R diagram is wrong?
Space-8. Complex structures of "young" galaxies and
nebulas. Some "young" galaxies, supposedly under 1 billion years old, had fully
developed, complex "structure" billions of years ago. (But that would not be a
problem for an infinitely old universe, would it?)
Space-9. Lack of modulation of the temperature of the 2.7K
"background" radiation by the large concentrations of mass detected. (This mass
concentration should have modulated the background, or "pulled-on" the
radiation inward, to modulate the signal and change or affect it’s temperature.)
This would not be a problem if the 2.7 K is more of an innocent bystander, just
minding it’s own business, and not left-over radiation from the beginning of
the Big Bang. Since the 2.7K is continually being replenished and re-created,
it is never pulled-in-on by the vast accumulations of mass detected in our
universe, and it is never modulated by large masses accumulated closer-in,
towards the center. The C-R theory also maintains that the radiation naturally
smooths-out itself, as it is driven by positive-positive ion self repulsion.
Space-10. Our universe is mostly matter. (It should not
have been created that way, from nothing, then balanced-out that soon) If our
universe was ALWAYS that way, then there is less of an intellectual challenge.
Notice, this is not a problem if our universe has ALWAYS been that way, but
it’s a much bigger problem if all matter emerged from nothing. If it was
created equally, but survived unequally with almost all antimatter disappearing,
that suggests real difficulties. This is still achieved after the initial spontaneous
creation of particles and anti-particles from nothing.
Space-11. Very dense, large stars, with abundant complex
metals have been found in supposedly very young star clusters or regions.
Again, not a problem for an infinitely old universe, but big trouble for
something happening "overnight", in the cosmic timescale. (Find regions,
names, designations)
Space-12. Why is there so much ionized hydrogen (nearer
the outer edges of the visible universe)? Up to 20% of the universe’s hydrogen
we know-of is ionized. The C-R theory has a pretty reliable source mechanism,
always ongoing, always operating. Near the outer edges, too?
Space-13. Masers in space. (A microwave analog to the
optical Laser) (needs many "primed or excited ions" throughout whole regions of
space to allow microwave amplification to take place) Directional beams of
microwaves, I believe were detected from OH radicals. (hydroxyl ions) Speculation
on Masers allowing creation of directional beams of microwave energy with
amplification. Needs a large available population of energetically excited
atoms in order to work. Two or three different frequencies (or resonance-modes).
(1720 Mhz was one of the frequencies.)
This phenomenon needs energized ions, and cannot
amplify anything with all ions sitting in their ground-energy state. This
suggests abundant energy, and activated ions.
Are other masers (driven by other excited ions)
also known-about?
Space-14. The Great Attractor (the most blueshifted place
or spot in the universe) Extensively dealt with in an earlier blog, very
significant to the C-R theory.
Earlier blog link ___
Space-15. No backrush has been detected coming from behind
the Great Attractor, indicating NO actual infalling.
Space-16. Space is NOT isotropic, or the same in all
directions. (Just looking-around in our universe, at the night sky tells us
so.) Objects way-out-there are definitely NOT the same as similar objects
closer-in, nearby to earth, time-wise. Just looking at space
objectively shows exactly that. The further-out you go, the less like earth
objects are, time-wise, and the slower they "clock", or the more they appear
redshifted.
Space-17. Almost ALL of the observed red-shift in distant
objects is not a Doppler shift, but a gravitationally caused shift. (The Great
Attractor gives us that answer.) This implies our universe is not expanding at
all, and not expanding at an increasing rate, either.
Space-18. Look for any electrical, high-current, or magnetically
caused event. This demonstrates a much higher electrical imbalance or
current-flow than standard theories expect. (Enormous regions displaying polarized
light, in every direction, also indicates so.)
Black-Hole C-R related ITEMS (grouped below):
BH-1. Many Black-Holes C-R can exist within one
(inside-of-a) Black-Hole C-R. No real upper limit (except the
ultimate density) to the number possible. A C-R theory exclusive idea.
BH-2. What causes the "jets" of highly concentrated, very
directional, near-light-speed velocities, jetting away from Black-Holes
C-R? HINT: Think of collimated, bunched electrons, all exiting near the
speed-of-light. Collectively, their combined magnetic fields bunch them to
punch-them out away from the Black-Hole C-R.
NOTE: Arnold Gulko’s article in Infinite Energy Magazine,
issue __, noted and asked: what causes jets to flee at nearly speed-of-light
after being pulled in by seemingly overwhelming force? (Freed electrons would
nicely do the trick) The C-R theory has a very simple answer. See section __
BH-3. Why 10,000 lesser Black-Holes C-R have
been found orbiting our galaxy’s central Black-Hole C-R? Almost
no-one else is remarking on this. It should be seen as a big anomaly that
these 10,000 are still orbiting around and have not all been eaten-up over
time, by the central supermassive Black-Hole C-R. (Why have no other
theories pounced upon this observation?) The C-R theory thinks it knows why.
BH-4. No mini-Black-Hole C-R evaporation (or
explosion when disappearing) Not viable in the C-R theory scenario. If
evidence of such a mini-Black-Hole C-R explosion is found, then the
C-R theory is wrong. C-R theory uses only 2-part Black-Holes C-R
exclusively. This isolates the energy-input part from the central, inner part,
which provides complete stability. See section __ in the C-R theory.
{Sub-item: We face absolutely NO danger from the LHC over in
Europe creating mini-Black-Holes C-R.)
BH-5. Recently, there was an electron-shadow measured
recently from a Black-Hole C-R approximately 3 billion years old.
This may indicate some "connection" between a Black-Hole C-R and
excess electrons available in the vicinity. See article in October 2009
Astronomy magazine, short article, page ___
NOVA, SUPERNOVA and increasing scale related ITEMS (below):
SN-0. Coronal Mass Ejections (CME) from our sun. (is it
positive ionization, release of concentrated protons?) the smallest "chunk" of
the nova, supernova, … chain of events. (a precursor to a full nova?) (not
listed as a "full" argument)
SN-1. There are multiple positively-ionized atoms present
in supernova remnants. Here is a link to a soft-X-ray source including ions 5+ and higher only. Notice, this supernova is at least 3,000 years old, and STILL includes this extensive list of multiple-positive ions, from the chart on page #3 One site listed 156 known different
ions, many with multiple-positive ionizations. Some of these ions were still
active 11,000 years after the original supernova event took place. That
suggests a staying-power not anticipated by standard theories.
Link-in pdf from soft X-ray ion list from the 3000 year-old
SNR N132D, featuring ions +5 and higher.
SN-2. Note the incredible damage done to the experimental
apparatus caused by the LHC’s "confined-proton release" event. (HINT: The C-R
theory says this release IS a guide to up-close supernova events.) What to
look for, evidence-wise, result-wise. NOTE: This also suggests a possible link
to CME-caused damages on earth to electrical systems here. The same type
mechanism is involved, but on an even larger scale.
SN-3. Scale-up, sunspots*, CME, nova, supernova, Seyfert
galaxy, active galaxy, quasar, GRB. All are increasing magnitude of the
same-type of event, all* work from the same plan, by the same cause mechanism.
(*almost all?) *sunspots may not be same-type.
SN-4. Dust-free supernova aftermath measured last year.
Not a problem for the C-R theory, if proton-proton repulsion swept clean the
entire neighborhood. Standard theory expected a very dusty remnant to be left
behind. See our video segment.
SN-5. Charged-particle release events Each event is
independently "self-smoothing" on a large scale. The C-R theory says these
events (smoothed-out over time) are the true source of the 2.7 K background
radiation we see. There is no connection whatsoever to a big bang.
No overall coordination is needed
to achieve the current, very smooth result. An advantage of system-design.
Scale-up these events from a nova, supernova, Seyfert Galaxy, Active galaxy,
quasar, and GRB (gamma ray burst).
(all these events are in the same family, increasing in
scale and magnitude, from item ___)
SN-6. Cosmic rays (high energy positive charges) (covered
in other blogs earlier) NOTE: A new article claims that some cosmic rays are also
composed-of an ionized nucleus of various heavy metals, as an ion, too, and
not just single protons.
SN-7. One cosmic ray last year was measured-as being worth
at least 300 quintillion electron-volts. That number could be very
reasonable, by the C-R theory scenario, but not by standard theories. See our
video segment. LINK
SN-8. An observed neutrino burst coinciding with the start
of a supernova burst in 1987. That is claimed by standard theories as proof of
the rapid thermonuclear fusion, freeing neutrinos. The C-R theory says,
neutrinos trapped over millions or billions of years are suddenly freed with
other supernova contents (concentrated protons and neutrons). Both explanations
might be correct, but neither explanation can be excluded from the observations.
SN-9. The prolonged glow from a supernova (and the amount
of excess positive ionization) after 450 years, it still has many
multiple-positive ionizations (see #__ too)
SN-10. Supernovae continue to expand long after they should
have cooled-down by expansion. One site listed some types-of ions still
accelerating after 11,000 years after the supernova event started.
SN-11. Fe23+ and other multi-positive ions
present in supernova remnants and Seyfert galaxies hint at a much-greater role
for multiple-positive ionization. Indicates high degree of multiple-positive
ionization. (and/or a lack of at least 23 local electrons, to smooth-out the multi-positive
ionizations. Unless there are not enough "single hydrogen atom" electrons
around to surrender their "one" to some heavy-metal’s absence of 5, 6, or
higher numbers.) Present in many, (ALL?) supernova remnants? NOTE: (I read
that there were 156 different ions reported in some supernova remnants. This
is not uncommon, and should be used as a guide, to suggest positive ions play a
much bigger role in explaining the actions of supernovae than standard theory
ever dreamed.) Here is a link to a soft-X-ray source including ions 5+ and higher only. Notice, this supernova is at least 3,000 years old, and STILL includes this extensive list of multiple-positive ions, from the chart on page #3
SN-12. Look for excess positive ions to be THE POWERING
SOURCE of supernova expansion, and the driving force. (These ions were not just
created in the aftermath, but were the initial, true, original CAUSE, driving
the explosive expansion.) That gives these ions a much greater STAYING power
over a prolonged period of time than heat-generated ions, (generated by
radiation as a by-product of the original explosion). That also explains why
those ions just don’t "appropriate" the electrons from much weaker, single
hydrogen atoms. There are simply not enough electrons available to compensate
for the sudden release into the environment of massive quantities of the proton-ions,
freed-up in the supernova.
SN-13. Cosmic rays coming from all directions, not just
some few specific local regions. Indicates that the sources are all over the
sky, in every direction.
The END {and/or conclusion} section ITEMS (below):
End-1. Irony: The larger our universe is, the less the
overall density needs to be to achieve full closure. {become the inside of a Black-Hole
C-R} As long as the sum of the mass is large enough to "close-off" the
universe everywhere at the outer edges, that is all that counts.
End-2. Farthest-off objects are only ageing (in real time)
at a few percent of earth’s time-rate. Their time-rate decreases with
increasing distance from the center (which is inside of us on earth in this universe). (Each time-rate varies
with the distance from the center, by location.)
This concept is unique to C-R theory; everyone else expects
their time is almost equal to ours, after correction for speeding away. This
is also why the Hubble constant isn’t really appropriate, as a measure of
increase. It is an "illusion", and not a true constant.
End-3. No need for dark matter, and no dark energy. The C-R
theory just doesn’t need them to explain our universe, as is. Will be
commented upon in later blogs.
End-4. The C-R theory process offers a better fit to
conservation-of-energy. No need for continual violation. A return to "science",
just like it was practiced 200 years ago, way-back-when, "when: not
violating conservation of energy" was considered BETTER science (or just good
science), and more likely to be found true.
______________________________________________________________________
This concludes the observations
section, where I have tried to remember some of the items I’ve read about in
the last 30 years or so. This blog is not intended to be a complete or
extensive list, but it is at least representative of many items observed in the
last 30 years which don’t fit-in well with a "Big Bang-derived" scenario.
These items don’t fit the mold or the standard theory’s expectations. They
don’t spring-out and say, Oh, I see why this would do that.
On the other hand, every one of
these items is MORE understandable IF and only IF a "C-R theory-type" process
is going on all around us. In every case, the C-R theory provides a new
pathway to see why these events occur like they do, how and why they are
interlinked, and the phenomena noted suggest a connection to some aspects of
the C-R theory, where a real difference would be expected. If the connection
is merely a figment of my imagination, then others at home will not notice this
possibility, too. If you, at home, do start to sense a connection, or you start
to realize, "Maybe the C-R theory isn’t all made-up, and maybe it does offer a
real positive contribution to linking-in ALL of these-type phenomena, and
giving us some good insights into the processes going on everywhere around us."
In the next blog, I’ll add-in another list of
speculations, questions, answers, and more, that will help to tie in the above
list, and root the items into a common scenario or framework. {I would have
added the list now, but the list just got way too long already for a simple
blog. I do intend to overwhelm the home readers with the abundance of these
type phenomena, and a large list does that best!!}
I did not provide current links to many of these
items above, as I’ve been aware of many of them for many years, and I don’t
have written down the original place or article-source where I first noted the
item. Most of these items now are Google searchable, and will readily link-to many
web sites that will cover each item from a non-C-R theory viewpoint. I did try
to provide a brief C-R theory spin, although not too extensive, as the list was
already long. I will try to provide more links at a later time, where home
readers can check-out several helpful web sites where these items are
mentioned.
My claim is that all the above items fit into a
giant puzzle, where each small piece provides a partial glimpse of the whole-ongoing
process. Only the C-R theory attempts to link-in ALL of these items, and show
WHY each one matters, how they are similar, and how each suggests that
"something-like what the C-R theory suggests is going-on, is really going-on."
There are probably thousands of similar observations, each one seemingly
insignificant, which can provide a picture of a universe brimming with
electrical, ionic, magnetic, and "freed-up electric-charge" activity. Such
evidence abounds.
I would contend that our universe IS NOT electrically
neutral overall, but that an enormous amount of electrical activity is
going on all around us, and our solar system has many known instances where
there is just too much electrical activity, too much current, too much
high-energy interaction to regard our universe (and outer space) as electrically
neutral.
No other theory has such a simple causative
mechanism. (The electrical universe web-sites claim some of the same electrical
activity, but simply have the electrical charges coming from "somewhere
else".) Standard theory is oblivious to the electrical activity, and dismisses
almost all of it as a coincidence or treats each phenomenon as an isolated
anomaly.
I would hope to persuade some
readers out there to simply look around, and notice all of the
phenomenon linked to electrical activity, cosmic rays (or high energy positive
charges), excess electrons, and polarized light. Realize that all such
activities indicate something is going on, and there probably is a good, simple
explanation for it all. The C-R theory is attempting to show you home readers
a new way to look at these type events, and to integrate them all into a much bigger,
more complete picture.
Please drop-in again soon, and I’ll try to
provide the second part of this blog within the next week, where I link in
further speculations, ask probing questions (with a C-R theory viewpoint
expecting something close to what we do see), providing some theory, and
suggesting why the C-R theory does now understand more of what is
actually seen, and how it all fits-in to an overall plan, with an overall
purpose, and how our universe is behaving as a finely-tuned system, with
everything going-on as a normal, everyday activity.
If you don’t want to wait until then, please
proceed over to the C-R theory (either version) and read as much as you can.
Many of the items mentioned here will be suggested from the descriptions
provided, and from the scenarios covered.
Oct. 10, 2009, the date this blog was last modified.
_______________________________________________End the 1st
part-of this blog